The current U.S. administration is advancing a major deal, valued at over $700 million, to sell F110 engines to Turkey for its KAAN aircraft project. Despite the administration’s attempts to bypass congressional barriers, this move is not an isolated event; rather, it is a strategic accelerator intended to pave the way for Ankara’s full return to the F-35 program. While Washington’s rationale seeks to preserve Turkey as an anchor within NATO, in practice, it creates a serious dilemma and presents a weighty, threefold strategic risk: Undermining NATO from within: Empowering an actor that is engaged in aggressive competition against Western allies (such as Greece) and is entrenching a defiant military presence in Cyprus. Fueling Regional Friction: Granting legitimacy to a competitive power that provides a safe haven for Hamas and supports the al-Sharaa regime in Syria. Creating a Systemic Risk to the Global F-35 Network: Deploying 5th-generation capabilities in proximity to Russian S-400 systems risks compromising and cracking the information security of the platform as a whole. This threat is not limited to the erosion of Israel’s qualitative edge or the exposure of its defense industries; it constitutes a direct threat to every country in the world equipped with the F-35, alongside concerns over the possible proliferation of KAAN aircraft to additional militaries across the Sunni sphere.

A year and a half after Assad's fall: What is the state of the Syrian economy, and what can it teach us about the future of the new Syria?

The stance on Israel has emerged as a key test at the ballot box during the Democratic primaries. How does this manifest, how does it impact Washington-Jerusalem relations, and does Israel have any recourse?

The State Comptroller’s latest report not only exposes deficiencies regarding foreign interference in Israeli elections, but also a deeper failure—a conceptual failure—that Israel must rectify ahead of the upcoming elections

Artificial intelligence is now integrated into the core of defense, intelligence, and economic operations, but its reliability depends entirely on the integrity of the data from which it learns. A new memorandum by Dr. Shay Hershkovitz examines one of the most significant vulnerabilities in the AI era: “data poisoning”—the covert and intentional manipulation of datasets or models. The memorandum demonstrates how this threat goes beyond a technical cyber problem and constitutes a profound strategic and cognitive threat. Adversaries can exploit these vulnerabilities to embed “dormant poisoning,” which remains inactive during routine operations but distorts decision-making processes in moments of crisis. The memorandum analyzes the dimensions of this asymmetric threat and presents a series of strategic recommendations for building national and institutional resilience against this challenge.