Publications
All PublicationsVoices from Gaza: What Are Gazans Saying About Disarming Hamas?
An analysis of surprising trends in Gazan discourse regarding "the day after"
22.10.26The Collapse of Hamas's Concept of Victory and the Erosion of the 'Armed Resistance' Ethos
How are cracks in the Palestinian public's support for Hamas's strategy of resistance being expressed—and how should Israel capitalize on this situation?
11.10.26A “Traffic Light” Model for Implementing the Board of Peace Framework in the Gaza Strip: Policy Recommendations for Israel
How can the Board of Peace plan for the future of the Gaza Strip be implemented in a way that does not jeopardize Israel's security?
26.09.26The Question Nobody’s Asking: Is it Even Possible to Rehabilitate* the Gaza Strip Under Existing Conditions, and if Not, What Then?
After each round of violent clashes between Israel and Hamas, the issue of rehabilitating the Gaza Strip and improving its economic situation is raised once again. The accepted working assumption is that given suitable political conditions, and in the framework of a political process based on an attempt to promote the realization of the two-state paradigm, in which the Gaza Strip and the West Bank are considered one political and territorial unit under the control of the Palestinian Authority, it will be possible to rehabilitate the Strip. But it appears that nobody has ever asked if the Gaza Strip can indeed be rehabilitated. In this paper I will try to clarify the meaning of “rehabilitation” in the context of the Gaza Strip, and with the aid of a matrix of variables, those that facilitate rehabilitation and those that disrupt it, examine a number of basic questions dealing with the actual feasibility of rehabilitating the Gaza Strip under existing conditions. Following that, with reference to my conclusion regarding the absence of sufficient conditions for a successful rehabilitation process, I will describe the characteristics of this state of affairs and its ramifications, and propose a number of possible options for dealing with the emerging situation in the absence of rehabilitation, with an emphasis on the importance of adopting logical guidelines which do not currently exist but which are here deemed to be essential for the success of such a process. The conclusion of this paper is that leaving Hamas in the Gaza Strip as a ruling entity and with their commitment to the preservation of the idea of armed resistance, are both strongly disruptive variables, and both are endogenous to the Palestinian system. Therefore, without neutralizing these two variables, or at least weakening them very considerably, it is hard to imagine that the rehabilitation process will succeed.
13.02.25