The Corona Crisis: Systemic Recommendations for Social Policy | INSS
go to header go to content go to footer go to search
INSS logo The Institute for National Security Studies, Strategic, Innovative, Policy-Oriented Research, go to the home page
INSS
Tel Aviv University logo - beyond an external website, opens on a new page
  • Contact
  • עברית
  • Support Us
  • Research
    • Topics
      • Israel and the Global Powers
        • Israel-United States Relations
        • Glazer Israel-China Policy Center
        • Russia
        • Europe
      • Iran and the Shi'ite Axis
        • Iran
        • Lebanon and Hezbollah
        • Syria
        • Yemen and the Houthi Movement
        • Iraq and the Iraqi Shiite Militias
      • Conflict to Agreements
        • Israeli-Palestinian Relations
        • Hamas and the Gaza Strip
        • Peace Agreements and Normalization in the Middle East
        • Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States
        • Turkey
        • Egypt
        • Jordan
      • Israel’s National Security Policy
        • Military and Strategic Affairs
        • Societal Resilience and the Israeli Society
        • Jewish-Arab Relations in Israel
        • Climate, Infrastructure and Energy
        • Terrorism and Low Intensity Conflict
      • Cross-Arena Research
        • Data Analytics Center
        • Law and National Security
        • Advanced Technologies and National Security
        • Cognitive Warfare
        • Economics and National Security
    • Projects
      • Preventing the Slide into a One-State Reality
      • Contemporary Antisemitism in the United States
      • Perceptions about Jews and Israel in the Arab-Muslim World and Their Impact on the West
  • Publications
    • -
      • All Publications
      • INSS Insight
      • Policy Papers
      • Special Publication
      • Strategic Assessment
      • Technology Platform
      • Memoranda
      • Posts
      • Books
      • Archive
  • Database
    • Surveys
    • Spotlight
    • Maps
    • Real-Time Tracker
  • Events
  • Team
  • About
    • Vision and Mission
    • History
    • Research Disciplines
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellowship and Prizes
    • Internships
    • Newsletter
  • Media
    • Communications
    • Video gallery
    • Press Releases
  • Podcast
  • Newsletter
New
Search in site
  • Research
    • Topics
    • Israel and the Global Powers
    • Israel-United States Relations
    • Glazer Israel-China Policy Center
    • Russia
    • Europe
    • Iran and the Shi'ite Axis
    • Iran
    • Lebanon and Hezbollah
    • Syria
    • Yemen and the Houthi Movement
    • Iraq and the Iraqi Shiite Militias
    • Conflict to Agreements
    • Israeli-Palestinian Relations
    • Hamas and the Gaza Strip
    • Peace Agreements and Normalization in the Middle East
    • Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States
    • Turkey
    • Egypt
    • Jordan
    • Israel’s National Security Policy
    • Military and Strategic Affairs
    • Societal Resilience and the Israeli Society
    • Jewish-Arab Relations in Israel
    • Climate, Infrastructure and Energy
    • Terrorism and Low Intensity Conflict
    • Cross-Arena Research
    • Data Analytics Center
    • Law and National Security
    • Advanced Technologies and National Security
    • Cognitive Warfare
    • Economics and National Security
    • Projects
    • Preventing the Slide into a One-State Reality
    • Contemporary Antisemitism in the United States
    • Perceptions about Jews and Israel in the Arab-Muslim World and Their Impact on the West
  • Publications
    • All Publications
    • INSS Insight
    • Policy Papers
    • Special Publication
    • Strategic Assessment
    • Technology Platform
    • Memoranda
    • Posts
    • Books
    • Archive
  • Database
    • Surveys
    • Spotlight
    • Maps
    • Real-Time Tracker
  • Events
  • Team
  • About
    • Vision and Mission
    • History
    • Research Disciplines
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellowship and Prizes
    • Internships
  • Media
    • Communications
    • Video gallery
    • Press Releases
  • Podcast
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
  • עברית
  • Support Us
bool(false)

Publications

Home Publications Special Publication The Corona Crisis: Systemic Recommendations for Social Policy

The Corona Crisis: Systemic Recommendations for Social Policy

Special Publication, April 13, 2020

עברית
Meir Elran
Carmit Padan
Shahar Ayal
A man wearing mask shops at a food market in Tel Aviv

Following the containment stage of the corona pandemic, Israel will be called upon to launch an economic and social recovery. That stage must be based on differential, nonlinear, and flexible management of the “emergency routine,” while gradually expanding functional continuity according to the sectors and population groups who from a health perspective can return to work, even if in limited format. While this policy incurs many risks, including a descent into uncontrolled infection, intelligent management through precise planning, meticulous implementation, focused public information, and operational flexibility will make it possible. Risk management is also required on social and economic levels, in order to facilitate and bolster national resilience, create the necessary basis for emergence from the crisis, and enable renewed future growth.


Basic Assumptions

  1. The COVID-19 virus is here for the long term. Therefore, Israel must prepare to deal in a prolonged manner with its widespread damage to the economy and to society. Reducing infection is essential for achieving the goal of flattening the curve, but the relaxation of restrictions is expected to prompt higher levels of infection.
  2. Overall, the Israeli public has so far displayed impressive capabilities in coping with the crisis and adhering to the government’s guidelines within the “contain and constrain” policy. Most of the public believes that the lockdown policy is correct. The perception of self-resilience and self-efficacy are still quite high.
  3. Inasmuch as the current policy becomes more restrictive, it creates significant damage for the economy and society. The continuation of the strict lockdown over time will create “psychological fatigue” and the public will have difficulty accepting the imposed restraints. This may even lead to cases of hazardous behavior. The use of fear-mongering in order to increase compliance with the guidelines is effective in the short term, but not in the long term. Tightening the lockdown will increase the public’s sense of vulnerability, certainly among the weaker sectors, and may have a negative impact on continued voluntary compliance.
  4. The State of Israel is heterogenic by nature. It has many weak population groups, and therefore requires a differential approach to each of them. It is not only the right of the weak to receive proper and equal assistance from the state; without a focused response to at-risk population groups, the risk to the health of others increases greatly.
  5. Against this background, there is no alternative but to prepare now for the moderate and differential relaxation of the lockdown policy. Systemic and meticulous preparation and focused implementation of research-based interventions are important.

Social Policy in “the Presence of Corona”

The essence of the proposed policy is the gradual construction of a differential “emergency routine,” which balances public health concerns with the need for rapid economic bouncing back. The aim is to enable low-risk population groups to return to work (with limitations) and to help jumpstart the functional revival – economic and social – of the entire national system, in parallel with the continued isolation of high-risk population groups.

This strategy must include critical benchmarks, with precise definition of the “released” population groups, the industries that will return to activity, the indices for determining the policy and its success, the stages of removing the limitations, and the conditions for transitioning from one stage to another. To a large extent these depend on the availability of a reliable database. Variable management of the crisis may lead to volatility in numbers of infected and in damages. For instance, the opening of schools – even in a controlled manner – is expected to lead to a new rise in infection levels. Risk management, e.g., ensuring that senior citizens remain protected and there is no contact between students and the elderly, is therefore imperative.

Managing the Risks of the New Policy

The main problem in the proposed differential model is the expected decline in the public’s staunch posture vis-à-vis the risks of the disease. This can easily lead to the “slippery slope” of greater public interaction and a return to mass infection.

The lockdown cannot be eased successfully in any way over time solely on the basis of government guidelines and police enforcement. “Self-enforcement” is also necessary as a basis for public behavior. In other words, a re-division of responsibility between the state and the citizen is necessary, with responsibility expected from the individual, his self-discipline, and his involvement. Voluntary compliance is important in the management of prolonged and complex crises: maintaining self-motivation and personal responsibility, whereby the public does what it thinks is correct. This approach is based on the theory of “regulation of good people,” which assumes that most of the population comprises “good people” who, informed by an adequate combination of clear and precise data and the threat of more severe coercion in the background, will cooperate with government directives.

As a response to these risks, preparedness for the implementation of the differential approach, particularly on the social plane, must be accompanied by the following main steps:

Planning: A designated professional committee should be established within the “corona cabinet” to design the social processes and gradually implement them. This requires lateral cooperation between government ministries (finance, welfare, education, health, and others), as well as vertical cooperation in planning and implementation with the local authorities and civil society, through leading NGOs, that must be assisted in view of current difficulties. Planning must be based on a differential approach, flexibility, public involvement, and proper budgeting.

Implementation must be gradual (in terms of easing of the lockdown) and flexible, according to cumulative healthcare data and variables. It requires precise regulations by economic sectors, and division by region and population group, taking into account the needs of weaker groups with less access to information. It must be done with maximal use of all national resources, including the IDF, the local authorities, and civil society groups. Most of the supervision of the implementation of the government guidelines must be done by workplaces and under their responsibility. At the same time, special attention must be paid to particular sectors, such as the ultra-Orthodox, Arabs (including Bedouin in the Negev and residents of eastern Jerusalem), individuals with special needs, and people in care-providing institutions. Groups that will remain under lockdown for a longer time are of special importance in this regard, as their particular physical and emotional needs must be addressed.

Public information: The implementation of the proposed model requires an end to the policy of  intimidation and a transition to targeted and precise public information for citizens, based on scientific data, under the heading: “Protect yourself for the sake of your family.” What is permitted and what is prohibited in each area and for each population group must be explicitly defined. The campaign must target both the general public and the individual. Where a differential policy is used, the campaign must be targeted according to distinct sectors, which requires particular skills. Professional spokespeople are needed to convey the messages to the public successfully. Both public leaders at the local level and heads of economic systems have an important role to play in the campaign, as a key to maintaining the public’s trust in the political system, which is critical to the success of the new policy.

The public health strategy, which has so far been the primary prism for managing the corona emergency, is now coming under broad criticism. That life must go on in the presence of the virus, while minimizing the serious damage that the crisis may cause the economy and society in the long term, is now understood. One assumption in planning the exit strategy is that a social crisis is a time bomb that must be at the forefront of public discourse and decision making. The concern is not that the corona pandemic may change the socioeconomic situation in Israel over time, but that it may aggravate the existing situation. Inequality and socioeconomic gaps are expected to grow to very serious proportions since the economic ramifications will first and foremost hit the weaker layers of society, the self-employed, and the salaried workers who join the widening circle of the unemployed every day. Therefore, in planning the exit from the corona predicament, along with economic issues, attention must be directed to the social crisis and the need to strengthen the social safety nets. In this framework, a support and social assistance program must be formulated, and the psychological assistance system must be reinforced. This approach can already help individuals and families in dealing with the ramifications of the emergency, and help them develop the necessary resilience to deal with the consequences of the pandemic now, and even more strongly on the “day after.”

The proposed differential policy is a basis for a chance for rapid recovery of the national system after the pandemic subsides. It is a clear expression of the societal resilience strategy that relies on the human capital in the national system. Israeli society, rich in economic, social, and moral capital, has displayed this wealth at every serious disruption and the diverse challenges it has weathered repeatedly. There is no reason that the corona crisis should be any different. The risks inherent in the model proposed here are not insignificant, but they can be overcome; progress in growth can be channeled toward a return to normal life. The successful handling of the crisis will also provide an opportunity to establish new patterns of public thought, decision making, and creative use of human capital.

________________________________

­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­­

The authors would like to thank Dr. Moran Bodes of the National Center for Trauma and Emergency Medicine Research at the Gertner Center, Prof. Orit Tikochinsky of the Interdisciplinary Center, and Prof. Yuval Feldman of Bar-Ilan University and the Israel Democracy Institute for their important contributions to  this article.

The opinions expressed in INSS publications are the authors’ alone.
Publication Series Special Publication
TopicsCoronavirusEconomics and National Security
עברית

Events

All events
The 18th Annual International Conference
25 February, 2025
08:15 - 16:00

Related Publications

All publications
Strategic Analysis for Israel 2023
Read the INSS Strategic Analysis for 2023
23/02/23
Shutterstock
The International System: One World, Two Worldviews, and Greater Divisiveness
The international system is struggling with many crises and challenges, led by the continued efforts at economic recovery from the COVID-19 crisis while coping with the pandemic itself; the intensifying competition between the United States and China, which heightens the divisiveness in the international dynamic; and the climate crisis, which tests the ability to cooperate despite disagreements. The US administration has less attention for the Middle East, and is restoring human rights considerations to a central place in its policy, against the backdrop of the mid-term elections and deep political polarization in the United States. All these issues underline the need to update Israel’s policy regarding the international arena, especially: deepening the coordination with the US administration and key actors in the international community, and enlisting their support for advancing Israel’s objectives. Chief among them are preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, and maximizing Israel’s comparative advantages, particularly in the fields of science and technology, to advance initiatives to help stabilize the Middle East and cope with the global climate crisis.
13/02/22
Strategic Survey for Israel 2022
The strategic assessment for Israel for 2021 is shaped by significant uncertainty in three principal areas: the level of success in coping with COVID-19; the modus operandi and policies of the new administration in the United States; and the political developments in Israel. The current assessment is based on a broader conception of national security, which places greater weight than in the past on the domestic arena and on threats to internal stability, social cohesion, values, and fabric of life. This of course does not detract from the urgency of security threats, which remain significant. In the face of this uncertainty, Israel will need to prioritize attention to the internal crisis; adjust itself to the competition between the great powers, which is affected by the pandemic; adapt to the Biden administration and coordinate with it on Iran and other issues; expand alliances and normalization agreements with additional countries in the region; and be ready for military escalation in the north and in the Gaza Strip arena, which could occur even though all of the actors involved prefer to avoid it.
21/12/21

Stay up to date

Registration was successful! Thanks.
  • Research

    • Topics
      • Israel and the Global Powers
      • Israel-United States Relations
      • Glazer Israel-China Policy Center
      • Russia
      • Europe
      • Iran and the Shi'ite Axis
      • Iran
      • Lebanon and Hezbollah
      • Syria
      • Yemen and the Houthi Movement
      • Iraq and the Iraqi Shiite Militias
      • Conflict to Agreements
      • Israeli-Palestinian Relations
      • Hamas and the Gaza Strip
      • Peace Agreements and Normalization in the Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States
      • Turkey
      • Egypt
      • Jordan
      • Israel’s National Security Policy
      • Military and Strategic Affairs
      • Societal Resilience and the Israeli Society
      • Jewish-Arab Relations in Israel
      • Climate, Infrastructure and Energy
      • Terrorism and Low Intensity Conflict
      • Cross-Arena Research
      • Data Analytics Center
      • Law and National Security
      • Advanced Technologies and National Security
      • Cognitive Warfare
      • Economics and National Secutiry
    • Projects
      • Preventing the Slide into a One-State Reality
      • Contemporary Antisemitism in the United States
      • Perceptions about Jews and Israel in the Arab-Muslim World and Their Impact on the West
  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • INSS Insight
    • Policy Papers
    • Special Publication
    • Strategic Assessment
    • Technology Platform
    • Memoranda
    • Database
    • Posts
    • Books
    • Archive
  • About

    • Vision and Mission
    • History
    • Research Disciplines
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellowship and Prizes
    • Internships
    • Support
  • Media

    • Communications
    • Video Gallery
    • Press Release
    • Podcast
  • Home

  • Events

  • Database

  • Team

  • Contact

  • Newsletter

  • עברית

INSS logo The Institute for National Security Studies, Strategic, Innovative, Policy-Oriented Research, go to the home page
40 Haim Levanon St. Tel Aviv, 6997556 Israel | Tel: 03-640-0400 | Fax: 03-744-7590 | Email: info@inss.org.il
Developed by Daat A Realcommerce company.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.