Since the outbreak of the war in Gaza, the Institute for National Security Studies has been regularly conducting public opinion surveys to assess attitudes toward key national security issues, national resilience, and public trust.[1]
A slight decline in public confidence in the IDF and in trust in the chief of staff
A majority of the Israeli public (75%) expresses high confidence in the IDF, down slightly from 77% in July and from a peak of 83% in June during the war against Iran. Among the Jewish public, 87% expresses high confidence in the IDF, while among the Arab public, it is particularly low—only 29%.
Trust in Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir stands at 60%, continuing a gradual decline from 62% in July and 69% in June. Among the Jewish public, 70% expresses high trust in him, compared to just 21% among the Arab public. The drop in trust is especially sharp among coalition voters, with a decline of about 10 percentage points in those expressing high trust in the chief of staff.
A majority of the Israeli public (76%) expresses high confidence in the Air Force, compared to 71% in April before Operation Rising Lion against Iran, although it is lower than the 83% in June during the operation itself.
Trust in the IDF spokesperson’s reports remains stable compared to July at 57%. Among the Jewish public, 65% expresses high trust in the spokesperson’s reports, versus only 22.5% in the Arab public. In particular, 56.5% of the Arab public claims having low confidence in the IDF spokesperson’s reports.
A modest recovery in trust in the prime minister
Confidence in the Israeli government remains very low: Only 23% of the public expresses high confidence in the government—unchanged from July. Among the Jewish public, confidence stands at 28%, compared to just 6% among the Arab public. A vast majority of the Arab public at 93% expresses low or no confidence at all in the government.
Trust in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has risen slightly: 30% of the Israeli public expresses high trust in him—a significant increase from 23% in July, and a return to the 30%–32% levels recorded during the operation in Iran in June. This rise stems almost entirely from increased confidence among coalition voters. Among the Jewish public, 36% expresses high trust in the prime minister, compared to only 6% among the Arab public.
The Gaza Front
Key Findings:
A growing gap between belief in an IDF victory in Gaza and belief that the war’s objectives can be achieved
A majority of the Israeli public (66%) believes the IDF will win the war in Gaza—up 4 percentage points from July (62%). By contrast, this month there was a 3% drop in the share of those who believe the war’s objectives will be achieved. Only 49.5% of the public considers it fully or largely possible, while 32% thinks it is only slightly possible, and a further 13% believes the objectives will not be achieved at all.
Most of the public believes government actions are not advancing the return of the hostages
A majority of the Israeli public (61%) thinks that only an agreement that includes ending the war can bring about the return of all the hostages. By contrast, 20% believes that all hostages can be returned through an agreement that does not end the war, and just 13% thinks they can be returned without any agreement.
A majority of the Israeli public (65%) believes the cabinet’s decision on the fighting in Gaza does not bring the hostages closer to home: 43% says the decision advances none of the war’s objectives, and another 21.5% believes it advances only the collapse of Hamas rule. Only 22% thinks the decision promotes both war objectives, while 3.5% says it advances only the return of the hostages.
Distrust in the conduct of the campaign
Most of the Israeli public believes there is no plan to end the war: 68% of the public says the government has no plan, while only 24% thinks otherwise.
A majority of the Israeli public (54.5%) thinks the decision to extend the fighting in Gaza was not made primarily for security reasons, compared to 41% of the public who believes it was. Views on the cabinet’s considerations are politically polarized—76% of opposition voters believe the decision was not based on security considerations, versus 79% of coalition voters who think the opposite.
The Israeli public is divided on whether there is effective cooperation between the political and military leadership in managing the war: 51% says there is no effective cooperation, compared to 42.5% who claims there is.
Military Service
Key Findings:
About a third of the Jewish public (32%) believes it is justified to refuse to participate in combat out of concern for the hostages’ safety—an increase of 4 percentage points compared to 28% in May. By contrast, 55% thinks it is not justified to refuse orders on these grounds, and another 13% responded “don’t know.”
Israel’s Foreign Relations
Key Findings:
The public expresses concern about possible international isolation of Israel: A majority of the Israeli public (66.5%) is worried about this possibility (31% very worried, 35.5% somewhat worried). Only 17% is not very worried, and 13.5% is not worried at all.
The Resilience of Israeli Society
Key Findings:
A majority of the Israeli public (67%) is concerned about the future of Israeli democracy (32% very concerned, 35% somewhat concerned). Only 19% is not very concerned, and 12% is not concerned at all.
Only 30% of the Israeli public reports high or very high levels of personal security, 45% reports a medium level, and 24% reports low or very low levels.
The majority of the Israeli public (67%) is optimistic about Israeli society’s ability to recover from the crisis and grow stronger, compared to 30% of the public who is pessimistic.
________________________
[1] The survey was conducted between August 11–24, 2025, by the Data Analytics Center at INSS. The fieldwork was carried out by iPanel and included online interviews with 803 Jewish respondents and 147 Arab respondents, forming a representative sample of the adult Israeli population aged 18 and above. Weighting was applied to ensure a balanced ratio between sectors. The maximum sampling error for the full sample is ± 3.2% at a confidence level of 95%.
* Nitsan Prayzler and Gal Shani assisted in preparing and conducting the survey.
The opinions expressed in INSS publications are the authors’ alone.