Europe

What is behind Russia’s escalating rhetoric and military actions toward European countries?

What lessons can be learned from the British response to Iranian influence operations—an issue that similarly affects Israel?

The American commitment—and the European price: What are the outcomes of the military alliance summit held in The Hague—and how will they affect Israel?

The European Union’s response to the war in Gaza has been widely criticized as irrelevant and incoherent, casting doubt on its ability to become a credible player in the region. While the EU is indeed incoherent, it is not entirely irrelevant. Its chief relevance lies in the civil sphere, mainly through its efforts to sustain and encourage reforms in the Palestinian Authority, and its role as a capacity builder. These EU actions and capabilities have political significance for the “day after” the war. The EU has many tools it can use in the region but has yet to show a collective willingness to fully employ them, because of internal divisions and the multiplicity of voices within it. The paper reviews these spheres of cacophony and maps the realignment of camps within the EU in response to the war in Gaza.