The withdrawal of climate science funding by the American government leaves a serious data gap that must be filled quickly. China is the country that, despite lacking territorial presence in the Arctic, is most able to fill this gap in Arctic research, particularly with regard to the region’s accelerated warming. This ability is not because China is the next most capable country, but rather because it is the only nation with the sheer resources to replace the American commitment.
Israel may seem far removed from the Arctic, yet it does have interests in the region, spanning defense, diplomacy, and economics. While the defense dimension has generally been beneficial, the diplomatic aspect has, at times, posed major challenges. The economic interests, although notable, are less significant compared to the other two. How Israel manages each of these areas could ultimately determine whether its engagement with the Arctic helps or harms its broader national interests.
American President Donald Trump has apparently made the acquisition of mineral rich Greenland a key part of American foreign policy. However, the Greenlandic people, following mixed experiences under Danish rule, want to be independent. If Greenland is acquired by the United States, it will set a dangerous precedent for Israel, while not doing much to help Israeli high tech’s resource security.
The Arctic is a key battleground in the great power competition, with China challenging US and Russian dominance. Claiming “near-Arctic state” status, China seeks access to resources and the Northern Sea Route (NSR) through its Polar Silk Road. Its investments in Arctic infrastructure face resistance, particularly from Western nations. Meanwhile, the involvement of China’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) in scientific research has raised security concerns. As the Arctic Council weakens, China aims to reshape regional governance,...
