Publications
Survey, June 24, 2025
Table of Contents:
Since the outbreak of the Swords of Iron war, the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) has been regularly conducting public opinion surveys aimed at examining public attitudes toward key national security issues, as well as national resilience and public trust.[1]
Click here to view the trends among the Jewish public | Click here to view the trends among the Arab public
Following the first survey conducted by the Data Analytics Center after the launch of Operation Rising Lion against Iran’s nuclear and military capabilities, the second survey—carried out one week later—shows overall stability in public perceptions, alongside several noteworthy trends.
Trust in Key Figures and Institutions
Key Findings:
- IDF: The high level of trust in the Israel Defense Forces remains steady—82% of the public expresses a high or very high level of trust, compared to 83% who were surveyed a week earlier, at the start of the Operation Rising Lion.
- The government: There is a slight continuation of the upward trend in trust in the government since the resumption of fighting—32% of the public expresses high or very high trust, compared to 30% a week earlier.
- IDF spokesperson: High trust in the IDF spokesperson has increased from 63% to 67%. Among the Jewish public, this upward trend is even more pronounced: Trust stood at 55% in May, rose to 71.5% at the onset of Operation Rising Lion and now, one week later, stands at 77% expressing high trust in the IDF spokesperson.
Operation Rising Lion: Situation Assessment and Civilian Resilience
Operation Rising Lion: Strategic Direction and End-State
________________________
[1] The survey was conducted between June 22–23, 2025, by the Data Analytics Center at the Institute for National Security Studies. The fieldwork was carried out by iPanel and included online interviews with 799 Jewish respondents and 154 Arab respondents, forming a representative sample of the adult Israeli population aged 18 and above. Weighting was applied to ensure a balanced ratio between sectors. The maximum sampling error for the full sample is ± 3.2% at a confidence level of 95%.