CV

    Anat N. Kurz is Director of Research, a senior researcher and editor of Insight at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS).  She holds an MA degree in social psychology and a PhD in political science from Tel Aviv University. Dr. Kurz has lectured and published extensively on the institutionalization processes of organized popular struggles and their oscillation between political and violent courses of action, the Palestinian national movement, Israeli-Palestinian relations, and policy dilemmas of dealing with sub-state conflicts. She has taken part in forums and conferences on strategic affairs, Middle Eastern security and conflict resolution as well as track-II Israeli-Palestinian and regional meetings. She is a member of the editorial board of Strategic Assessment, quarterly published by INSS. Her current research focuses on Israeli-Palestinian and intra-Palestinian politics.

    Dr. Kurz' most recent books are Fatah and the Politics of Violence: The Institutionalization of a Popular Struggle (Sussex Academic Press and JCSS (2005) and The Palestinian Uprisings: War with Israel, War at Home. Tel Aviv: INSS Memorandum no. 98 (2009). She is the editor and contributing author of Contemporary Trends in World Terrorism (1987); Islamic Terrorism and Israel: Hizballah, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hamas (1993); Hamas: Radical Islam in a National Struggle (1997); as well as the co-editor and contributing author of the INSS annual volumes Strategic Survey for Israel 2009 - 2016; The Lessons of Operation Protective Edge (2014) and Negotiating in Times of Conflict (2015). She is also co-editor of Arms Control Dilemmas: Focus on the Middle East (2012); Arms Control and National Security: New Horizons (2014); and Arms Control and Strategic Stability in the Middle East and Europe (2016).
    Anat Kurz
    Anat Kurz
    Senior Researcher and Director of Research
    download image
    anatk@inss.org.il
    03-640-0409
    Policy Papers
    The State of Israel’s National Security: Doctrine and Policy Guidelines for 2025–2026
    Contemporary Israel, probably more than ever before, requires a widely accepted national security doctrine—grounded in the values of Israel’s Declaration of Independence. Its overarching objectives are to ensure Israel’s security, prosperity, and Jewish-democratic character, with a firm Jewish majority and defensible, recognized borders
    2 March, 2025
    INSS Insight
    The Operation in Jenin: Time for a Complementary Move
    Operation Home and Garden brought a prevailing sense of operational success, but without a complementary political move, the military achievement will wear off quickly. This will lead to greater weakness of the Palestinian Authority’s capabilities and stature, which in turn would accelerate Israel’s slide toward a dangerous one-state reality. How should Israel act?
    16 July, 2023
    Strategic Survey for Israel
    Strategic Analysis for Israel 2023
    Read the INSS Strategic Analysis for 2023
    23 February, 2023
    Chapters
    The Palestinian Arena: Reshuffling the Cards
    Current Situation  – Following escalation in the West Bank in 2022, volatility has increased · Weaker PA · Hamas has grown stronger |  Current Israeli Strategy – New government’s policy lines depart from the strategy that prevailed until now · Postpone weighty decisions · Maintain a calm security situation for as long as possible | Israel’s Strategic Gap – Focus on conflict management with no effort toward a future agreement · Palestinian burden on Israel increases · Time is a critical vector in the slide toward a one-state reality | Recommended Strategy – Short term: curb escalation and prevent dissolution of the PA · Long term: prevent a slide into a one-state reality through separation steps and regional, international assistance to build functioning Palestinian entity.
    16 February, 2023
    Special Publication
    The Negev Summit – What Next?
    While the foreign ministers of the states of the Abraham Accords shook hands at Sde Boker, the researchers at the Institute for National Security Studies convened to analyze the meanings of the historic summit and its different aspects: the international, the American, and the Middle Eastern, with emphasis on Iran, the Gulf states, Egypt, Morocco, and two representatives that were not there – Jordan and the Palestinians
    3 April, 2022
    Strategic Assessment
    Price Tag
    The uprising that wasn't
    Anat Kurz
    ,Article
    11 February, 2011
    A response to a Euro-Mediterranean appeal
    Anat Kurz
    ,Article
    8 January, 2009