The Biden Administration Faces Serious Domestic Challenges | INSS
go to header go to content go to footer go to search
INSS logo The Institute for National Security Studies, Strategic, Innovative, Policy-Oriented Research, go to the home page
INSS
Tel Aviv University logo - beyond an external website, opens on a new page
  • Contact
  • עברית
  • Support Us
  • Research
    • Topics
      • Israel and the Global Powers
        • Israel-United States Relations
        • Glazer Israel-China Policy Center
        • Russia
        • Europe
      • Iran and the Shi'ite Axis
        • Iran
        • Lebanon and Hezbollah
        • Syria
        • Yemen and the Houthi Movement
        • Iraq and the Iraqi Shiite Militias
      • Conflict to Agreements
        • Israeli-Palestinian Relations
        • Hamas and the Gaza Strip
        • Peace Agreements and Normalization in the Middle East
        • Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States
        • Turkey
        • Egypt
        • Jordan
      • Israel’s National Security Policy
        • Military and Strategic Affairs
        • Societal Resilience and the Israeli Society
        • Jewish-Arab Relations in Israel
        • Climate, Infrastructure and Energy
        • Terrorism and Low Intensity Conflict
      • Cross-Arena Research
        • Data Analytics Center
        • Law and National Security
        • Advanced Technologies and National Security
        • Cognitive Warfare
        • Economics and National Security
    • Projects
      • Preventing the Slide into a One-State Reality
      • Contemporary Antisemitism in the United States
      • Perceptions about Jews and Israel in the Arab-Muslim World and Their Impact on the West
  • Publications
    • -
      • All Publications
      • INSS Insight
      • Policy Papers
      • Special Publication
      • Strategic Assessment
      • Technology Platform
      • Memoranda
      • Posts
      • Books
      • Archive
  • Database
    • Surveys
    • Spotlight
    • Maps
    • Real-Time Tracker
  • Events
  • Team
  • About
    • Vision and Mission
    • History
    • Research Disciplines
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellowship and Prizes
    • Internships
    • Newsletter
  • Media
    • Communications
      • Articles
      • Quotes
      • Radio and TV
    • Video gallery
    • Press Releases
  • Podcast
  • Newsletter
New
Search in site
  • Research
    • Topics
    • Israel and the Global Powers
    • Israel-United States Relations
    • Glazer Israel-China Policy Center
    • Russia
    • Europe
    • Iran and the Shi'ite Axis
    • Iran
    • Lebanon and Hezbollah
    • Syria
    • Yemen and the Houthi Movement
    • Iraq and the Iraqi Shiite Militias
    • Conflict to Agreements
    • Israeli-Palestinian Relations
    • Hamas and the Gaza Strip
    • Peace Agreements and Normalization in the Middle East
    • Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States
    • Turkey
    • Egypt
    • Jordan
    • Israel’s National Security Policy
    • Military and Strategic Affairs
    • Societal Resilience and the Israeli Society
    • Jewish-Arab Relations in Israel
    • Climate, Infrastructure and Energy
    • Terrorism and Low Intensity Conflict
    • Cross-Arena Research
    • Data Analytics Center
    • Law and National Security
    • Advanced Technologies and National Security
    • Cognitive Warfare
    • Economics and National Security
    • Projects
    • Preventing the Slide into a One-State Reality
    • Contemporary Antisemitism in the United States
    • Perceptions about Jews and Israel in the Arab-Muslim World and Their Impact on the West
  • Publications
    • All Publications
    • INSS Insight
    • Policy Papers
    • Special Publication
    • Strategic Assessment
    • Technology Platform
    • Memoranda
    • Posts
    • Books
    • Archive
  • Database
    • Surveys
    • Spotlight
    • Maps
    • Real-Time Tracker
  • Events
  • Team
  • About
    • Vision and Mission
    • History
    • Research Disciplines
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellowship and Prizes
    • Internships
  • Media
    • Communications
      • Articles
      • Quotes
      • Radio and TV
    • Video gallery
    • Press Releases
  • Podcast
  • Newsletter
  • Contact
  • עברית
  • Support Us
bool(false)

Publications

Home Publications INSS Insight The Biden Administration Faces Serious Domestic Challenges

The Biden Administration Faces Serious Domestic Challenges

While three years remain to President Biden’s first term, the coming year, with midterm elections in November, stands to be critical. Biden, beset by low popularity ratings, will likely direct most of his attention to domestic challenges – including severe political divisions even within the Democratic Party and a public that is tired and frustrated following two years of the pandemic. How should Israel respond to the change in Washington’s priorities?

INSS Insight No. 1545, January 2, 2022

עברית
Eldad Shavit
Rotem Oreg

In the coming year, President Joe Biden and his administration will almost certainly continue to focus primarily on complex domestic issues. Although in any event the President has three more years left to his first term, his ability to fulfill his promises will have a dramatic impact on his presidency and the legacy he leaves. Inter alia, Biden and the Democrats are expected to face the possibility that in the November 2022 midterm elections the party will lose the slim majority it currently enjoys in both houses of Congress. Israel should invest serious thought regarding the political polarization and demographic and social changes in the United States, and the long-term implications of these trends for the commitment of future American presidents and legislators to its security. It is recommended that Israel respond to the changing priorities in the United States and work to expand its relations with Washington to include “day-to-day life”: health, climate, economy, and technology, areas in which Israel has a relative advantage, in order to maximize its potential as an asset to the US administration.


2022 will mark a challenging year for the US administration. Although President Biden must confront many difficult foreign policy issues, some of them potentially explosive – such as Ukraine, Taiwan, and Iran – he and his administration, particularly in advance of the November 2022 midterm Congressional elections, will likely continue to focus most of their efforts on implementing their agenda on domestic issues. Over the past year, the administration has sought to advance its infrastructure and economic reconstruction program in the United States through a number of parallel efforts – while at the same time dealing with waves of COVID-19 and a "tired" public, which has difficulty cooperating and is divided about the steps required to address the pandemic.

In a move supported by both parties, the $1 trillion Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act was enacted to upgrade American infrastructure (transportation, communications, water, and electricity). In tandem, however, the administration faces difficulties due to opposition from Republicans and Senator Joe Manchin, one of the last conservatives in the Democratic Party, to pass its flagship legislation, the Build Back Better Framework, which it describes as a once-in-a-generation plan. The legislation, at a cost of $1.75 trillion, includes huge investments in the fields of economics, welfare, and climate. It is not yet clear whether the opposition will completely block the legislation or whether the administration will be able to maneuver and eventually present an adjusted framework. Either way, the process attests to the depth of the rift that exists within the Democratic Party between the moderates and the progressives, and especially to the President’s difficulty in running and controlling his party.

These issues and rising inflation (6.8 percent in the past year, the highest rate since 1982) clearly do not contribute to the president's popularity with the American public. Republican opposition to his leadership is predictable, but his support among Democratic voters is also eroding. According to a Gallup poll from December, support for Biden was about 43 percent: with the exception of former President Trump, support rates for previous presidents a year after taking office were higher. It is likely that the frustration of the President and his staff is particularly heightened because of the difficulties in marketing their successes and the inability to rise in the polls, since in recent months the administration has managed to score quite a few achievements in advancing its promises – in particular: the improvement of employment indices, the Infrastructure Law, and other legislation that included the most extensive economic assistance program in the history of the United States, amounting to $1.9 trillion, to deal with the crisis triggered by the pandemic.

Although President Biden has three more years left until the end of his first term, his ability to fulfill his promises in the coming year will have a dramatic impact on his presidency and the legacy he leaves. In the meantime, Biden and the Democrats are expected to face the danger that in the November 2022 midterm elections (in which one-third of the Senate and all members of the House of Representatives are elected) the party will lose the slim majority it currently enjoys in both houses of Congress – making it nearly impossible for the administration to pass laws that are not in the national consensus. Recent polls suggest that the chances of a Republican majority in the Senate and House of Representatives are very high.

The President is no doubt distressed by the challenges in implementing his agenda, as mitigation of social tensions in the United States is the most important challenge facing him and his administration – these days a seemingly impossible task. In his inaugural address, Biden stressed that much work needs to be done to heal the nation, and promised to fight "extremism” and “domestic terrorism"; he insisted that he would be the president of all US citizens – even those who did not vote for him. Biden, whose election campaign ran with the message that it was a "battle for the soul of America," promised during his speech to invest everything for the unification of the country.

Promises notwithstanding, it is highly doubtful whether the administration has succeeded in advancing this difficult and complex task in any way. Recent months have shown that party polarization remains dominant and almost insurmountable. After a very short period, following the change of administrations, Trump's momentum in the Republican Party has grown: the former president continues to control the party, albeit without an official leadership position, and is in the midst of a campaign to clear its ranks of any hint of personal criticism, opposition, or disloyalty. The central motif in Trump's speeches and public interviews is the rejection of the validity of the 2020 elections, thus reinforcing the polarization and distrust in United States institutions. Even if the deadly onslaught on Capitol Hill, two weeks before the Biden inauguration, caused a shock in the United States, no significant change was recorded in the conduct of the two parties. President Biden, formerly known as the one who bridged the gap between parties, has succeeded in passing the Infrastructure Act but has encountered great difficulty advancing beyond that agenda – even if he meets the interests of Republicans, he still meets with their opposition.

Moreover, Biden himself reiterates that he is has engaged with “the most significant test of [US] democracy since the Civil War." In a speech (July 2021) at the Philadelphia Constitution Hall, Biden stressed, "I swore an oath to you, to God – to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution. And that’s an oath that forms a sacred trust to defend America against all threats both foreign and domestic." These promises were made following changes in the election laws led by the Republican Party in 19 states across the United States, in which it has a majority in Congress, which they say is designed to protect the purity of the election. The Democrats, for their part, charge that the amendments are intended to make it difficult for minorities and low-income individuals, who tend to vote for the Democrats, to exercise their right to vote.

Political polarization has overshadowed other controversies in recent years, and the polls indicate that most of the public thinks that American democracy is under attack and that political violence is only likely to increase. The political controversies are indicative of a divided and conflicted nation characterized by growing social gaps (particularly between the cosmopolitan cities, which tend to vote for Democrats, and the rural, Republican space for the most part), as well as inter-ethnic tensions that often contribute to violence. Voting data from the election indicate that voting for one candidate or another does not merely reflect political divides, but reflect geographic, class, religious, ethnic, and ideological differences that jeopardize the state's ability to maintain a functioning political and social system.

In recent years, the growing preoccupation with existential problems has increasingly focused the American citizen on what is happening around him and the immediate threats to his personal neighborhood, and less on problems overseas. Accordingly, President Biden has understood that it is necessary to position himself as investing most of the resources at his disposal to promote internal reconstruction before turning to address other issues in the global arena – much like his predecessors Trump and Obama, each in his own way. However, hopes that Biden's election and Trump's removal from the presidency will lead to a changing reality, and the expectation that the United States will gain inspiring leadership in the near future that succeeds in reversing the alarming trend are giving way to growing pessimism.

Even if the internal events in the United States have no direct impact on Israel, developments will have a direct impact on Israeli interests on several levels, indirectly and over time. The United States remains the most influential global power in the world, even as its priorities are changing, and this has a direct impact on the international actors, including in the Middle East. Therefore, Israel must invest deep thought in the long-term implications of political polarization and demographic and social changes in the United States. It must assess how these might impact on the commitment of future American presidents and legislators to its security – and even assume that what is underway in the American arena will erode the deep understanding that exists among the current leadership in the United States regarding Israeli national security needs.

Israel would do well to adapt to the changing priorities in the United States, and work to expand its relations with Washington to include "day-to-day life" issues: health, climate, economy, and technology. Israel has a relative advantage in these areas, which may be an asset for Washington. In this way, the ties between the countries will be maintained and strengthened. Israel must also diversify its support base and step up its efforts to connect with audiences that lack a significant historical affinity for Israel, and not rely heavily on the support of evangelicals and American Jews.

 

_______

Rotem Oreg researches and lectures on United States politics and foreign policy. He is the founder of the Israel-Democratic Alliance, a non-profit that works to advance relations between Israel and the Democratic Party on the basis of shared liberal values, and the editor in chief of Washington Express, a blog that covers and analyzes American politics and foreign policy. Follow him on Twitter - @ildemall ,@WashingtonExp.

The opinions expressed in INSS publications are the authors’ alone.
Publication Series INSS Insight
TopicsIsrael-United States Relations
עברית

Events

All events
The 18th Annual International Conference
25 February, 2025
08:15 - 16:00
Photo: Ronen Topelberg

Related Publications

All publications
REUTERS/Brian Snyder
President Trump’s Visit to the Gulf: A Shifting Regional Order and the Challenge for Israel
What are the outcomes of Trump’s diplomatic visit to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the United Arab Emirates—and how do they affect Israel?
19/05/25
Between a Nuclear Arrangement and Military Strike in Iran—Toward a Decision
The talks that began in April 2025 between Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi and the US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff—with Oman’s mediation—are bringing Iran, the United States, and Israel closer to critical moments regarding the future of Iran’s nuclear program. The results of the negotiations will largely determine whether the direction will be toward a political-diplomatic settlement on the nuclear issue or toward a military strike (Israeli, American, or joint) against Iran’s nuclear facilities. At this stage, it is clear that both the Iranian leadership, headed by Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, and the American administration, led by President Donald Trump, prefer a diplomatic solution over military confrontation, the outcomes and consequences of which are difficult to foresee. However, in the absence of an agreement that blocks Iran’s path to nuclear weapons, and given a decision to resort to a military option, Israel must coordinate this with the United States—even if this does not guarantee active American participation in the strike. Coordination and cooperation with the United States are necessary for Israel to defend against an Iranian response, preserve achievements following the strike, and ensure American support in efforts to prevent the rehabilitation of Iran’s nuclear program—whether by kinetic military means, covert operations, or diplomatic measures. In any case, it is essential to emphasize the need for a comprehensive campaign against Iran and not solely against its nuclear program. A joint American–Israeli strike could provide the optimal solution to the challenge, provided it is part of a broader campaign against the Islamic Republic and should be planned accordingly. At the end of such a campaign, a complementary diplomatic move must be led, ensuring the achievement of all strategic goals against Iran, including blocking its path to nuclear weapons, dismantling the pro-Iranian axis, and imposing limits on its missile project.  
06/05/25
Shutterstock
The Nuclear Talks Between the United States and Iran—Chances for Reaching an Agreement and Implications for Israel
The gaps between Tehran and Washington have not yet narrowed significantly, but it seems that both sides are determined to reach an agreement and avoid a military escalation. How should Israel, which is on the sidelines of the talks, act in this situation?
05/05/25

Stay up to date

Registration was successful! Thanks.
  • Research

    • Topics
      • Israel and the Global Powers
      • Israel-United States Relations
      • Glazer Israel-China Policy Center
      • Russia
      • Europe
      • Iran and the Shi'ite Axis
      • Iran
      • Lebanon and Hezbollah
      • Syria
      • Yemen and the Houthi Movement
      • Iraq and the Iraqi Shiite Militias
      • Conflict to Agreements
      • Israeli-Palestinian Relations
      • Hamas and the Gaza Strip
      • Peace Agreements and Normalization in the Middle East
      • Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States
      • Turkey
      • Egypt
      • Jordan
      • Israel’s National Security Policy
      • Military and Strategic Affairs
      • Societal Resilience and the Israeli Society
      • Jewish-Arab Relations in Israel
      • Climate, Infrastructure and Energy
      • Terrorism and Low Intensity Conflict
      • Cross-Arena Research
      • Data Analytics Center
      • Law and National Security
      • Advanced Technologies and National Security
      • Cognitive Warfare
      • Economics and National Secutiry
    • Projects
      • Preventing the Slide into a One-State Reality
      • Contemporary Antisemitism in the United States
      • Perceptions about Jews and Israel in the Arab-Muslim World and Their Impact on the West
  • Publications

    • All Publications
    • INSS Insight
    • Policy Papers
    • Special Publication
    • Strategic Assessment
    • Technology Platform
    • Memoranda
    • Database
    • Posts
    • Books
    • Archive
  • About

    • Vision and Mission
    • History
    • Research Disciplines
    • Board of Directors
    • Fellowship and Prizes
    • Internships
    • Support
  • Media

    • Communications
    • Articles
    • Quotes
    • Radio and TV
    • Video Gallery
    • Press Release
    • Podcast
  • Home

  • Events

  • Database

  • Team

  • Contact

  • Newsletter

  • עברית

INSS logo The Institute for National Security Studies, Strategic, Innovative, Policy-Oriented Research, go to the home page
40 Haim Levanon St. Tel Aviv, 6997556 Israel | Tel: 03-640-0400 | Fax: 03-744-7590 | Email: info@inss.org.il
Developed by Daat A Realcommerce company.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.