International Isolation and Sanctions

Key Findings

The proportion of those selecting this scenario as a main threat rose from 21% in February 2026 to 26%, while the most notable increase was in its perceived likelihood of occurrence—from 26% to 37%. 60% anticipate high or very high damage (compared to 55% in the previous wave, with no statistically significant difference). In the July survey, 50% of the full public sample assess the State’s preparedness for this scenario as low or very low. Notably, this scenario was prominent among experts (44%, compared to 26% among the public), such that the trend in the current wave brings public perceptions somewhat closer to those of the experts.

Should this threat occur, the damage anticipated by the majority of respondents will manifest in financial security and standard of living (60%).

Selected as One of the Three Most Threatening Scenarios over the Next Five Years

Public – July 2026 Public – February 2026 Experts – February 2026

Selected as the Single Most Significant Threat

Public – July 2026 Public – February 2026 Experts – February 2026

Likelihood of the Scenario Occurring within the Next Five Years

High or Very High Likelihood Moderate Likelihood Low or Very Low Likelihood Don’t Know

Public – July 2026

Public – February 2026

Experts – February 2026

Anticipated Damage to the State of Israel if the Scenario Occurs

High or Very High Damage Moderate Damage Little or No Damage Don’t Know

Public – July 2026

Public – February 2026

Experts – February 2026

Public – July 2026

How Prepared Is Israel Currently to Cope with This Scenario?

Full Public Sample

High or Very High Preparedness 11%
Moderate Preparedness 35%
Low or Very Low Preparedness 50%
Don’t Know 4%

Public – July 2026

Expected Degree of Impact across Different Domains

High or Very High Impact Moderate Impact Low or No Impact Don’t Know

Functioning of State Authorities

Sense of Personal Security

Financial Security and Standard of Living

Emotional and Social Resilience