Changes in Israel’s strategic environment and the threats the country now faces require a systematic reexamination of the military component in the national security of the state. This examination must include the principle of force application and the components of the force buildup in light of the changes in threats. These questions of force buildup and application will have a decisive impact on the IDF’s readiness to provide an appropriate response to the spectrum of threats it currently faces.
The research field will address the range of IDF action, which includes contending with the conventional threat and with threats of terrorism. Focus is likewise on the development of an IDF response, both offensive and defensive, to the threat of high trajectory missiles and rockets targeting the state’s civilian home front. In addition to these issues, the research field will address the need to confront the potential dangers presented by the nonconventional threat, first and foremost that posed by Iran.
The research field will examine the interface and interaction between the IDF and the state political system, while addressing the resulting implications for the decision making process regarding force buildup and use. In addition to the focus on the IDF, the research field will consider aspects relating to universal military research, based on the assumption that this research can play a significant role in deepening the foundation of knowledge in this realm.
In Their Death, They Commanded Us to Live: A Memorial Project for the Fallen of the Swords of Iron War
We invite you to look and learn about the fallen through this annual memorial project—to once again recognize how, in the microcosm of the people’s army, the character of its fallen reflects the society itself.
Three Strategic Paths to Achieve the Objectives of the War—One Is Preferable
Occupying the Gaza Strip, imposing a siege, or establishing an alternative civil administration while Hamas remains underground: Which of these three is the most preferable (or least harmful) option for achieving the goals of the war in Gaza—and how can the inherent challenges be addressed?
“A Friend Brings a Friend” in the IDF? Similarity Bias and Its Impact on Cognitive Fixation
An examination of General Staff appointments over the past five decades reveals a frequent selection of individuals from the Paratroopers and Sayeret Matkal units for key positions. What are the implications of this—and what should the new chief of staff learn from it?
Israel’s National Security Concept: Functional Incoherence and the October 7 Disaster
The October 7, 2023, attack recharged discussions surrounding Israel’s national security concept. This article claims that the national security concept consists of three interwoven layers—security doctrine, security strategy and military strategy (or operational concept in the Israeli jargon)—and that their misalignment is a prominent reason that led to Israel’s failure. Accordingly, the article attempts to present a partial answer to why the October 7 failure occurred, unlike the investigations so far, which address what happened and not why. The author argues that the renewed discussion of this issue does not distinguish clearly enough between the national security concept per se and its implementation through security decision-making. The principles of the existing national security concept were relevant enough to successfully cope with the October 7 attack, and the failure resulted from how they were applied in practice by both the political echelon and the military leadership. The article presents and analyzes the three layers of the national security concept and their misalignment in the years before October 7, 2023, and examines the corrections needed to improve decision-making processes and the functional coherence of the national security concept.