Data Center

National Security Survey - July 2026

Full Findings

The findings are organized by topic and subtopic. Use the breakdowns available for each question, and view trends where available.

Gaps in trust between the security establishment and the political leadership – share expressing trust to a large or fairly large extent

Trust in the security institutions remains relatively high and largely crosses political camps, although the gap between Jews and Arabs remains pronounced.

The IDF and the Mossad receive the highest levels of trust, followed by the IDF Intelligence Directorate and the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet). Trust in some institutions and officials has declined relative to previous measurements.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Mossad
74%
IDF
73%
IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
62%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)
61%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir
59%
Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman
49%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini
46%
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
31%
Minister of Defense Israel Katz
30%
Government of Israel
25%
A sharp gap persists between relatively high trust in the security establishment and low trust in the political leadership.
Show data table
Institution / figureGeneral sample
Mossad74%
IDF73%
IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)62%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)61%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir59%
Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman49%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini46%
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu31%
Minister of Defense Israel Katz30%
Government of Israel25%

Trust in Institutions and Public Figures

A persistent gap between relatively high trust in the security establishment and low, polarized trust in the political leadership.

Security Establishment

5 questions

Gaps in trust between the security establishment and the political leadership – share expressing trust to a large or fairly large extent

Trust in the security institutions remains relatively high and largely crosses political camps, although the gap between Jews and Arabs remains pronounced.

The IDF and the Mossad receive the highest levels of trust, followed by the IDF Intelligence Directorate and the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet). Trust in some institutions and officials has declined relative to previous measurements.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Mossad
74%
IDF
73%
IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
62%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)
61%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir
59%
Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman
49%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini
46%
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
31%
Minister of Defense Israel Katz
30%
Government of Israel
25%
A sharp gap persists between relatively high trust in the security establishment and low trust in the political leadership.
Show data table
Institution / figureGeneral sample
Mossad74%
IDF73%
IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)62%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)61%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir59%
Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman49%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini46%
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu31%
Minister of Defense Israel Katz30%
Government of Israel25%
Coalition votersOpposition voters
Mossad
85%
78%
IDF
82%
79%
IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
65%
73%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)
71%
65%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir
61%
72%
Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman
71%
41%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini
71%
32%
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
68%
6%
Minister of Defense Israel Katz
59%
10%
Government of Israel
55%
6%
A sharp gap persists between relatively high trust in the security establishment and low trust in the political leadership.
Show data table
Institution / figureCoalition votersOpposition voters
Mossad85%78%
IDF82%79%
IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)65%73%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)71%65%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir61%72%
Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman71%41%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini71%32%
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu68%6%
Minister of Defense Israel Katz59%10%
Government of Israel55%6%
Jewish publicArab public
Mossad
83%
35%
IDF
83%
34%
IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
70%
33%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)
68%
31%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir
67%
28%
Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman
55%
22%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini
52%
20%
Minister of Defense Israel Katz
34%
11%
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
37%
6%
Government of Israel
31%
5%
A sharp gap persists between relatively high trust in the security establishment and low trust in the political leadership.
Show data table
Institution / figureJewish publicArab public
Mossad83%35%
IDF83%34%
IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)70%33%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)68%31%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir67%28%
Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman55%22%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini52%20%
Minister of Defense Israel Katz34%11%
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu37%6%
Government of Israel31%5%
Back to topic selection

Trust in the IDF and IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir

Security Institutions and Officials. Trust in the security institutions remains relatively high, although gaps by population group remain pronounced.

Seventy-three percent of the public express high trust in the IDF, compared with 25 percent who report low trust. Trust in the IDF remains high in both political camps: 83 percent of coalition voters and 79 percent of opposition voters express high trust.

Fifty-nine percent of the public express high trust in IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, compared with 33 percent who report low trust. Political breakdown: 61 percent of coalition voters and 72 percent of opposition voters express high trust.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know

IDF

General sample
35%
38%
14%
11%

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir

General sample
26%
33%
19%
14%
8%
The IDF receives high levels of trust, while trust in the IDF chief of staff is lower but remains relatively high.
Show data table
IndicatorGroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
IDFGeneral sample35%38%14%11%2%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirGeneral sample26%33%19%14%8%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know

IDF

Coalition voters
45%
37%
13%
Opposition voters
34%
45%
12%
9%

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir

Coalition voters
22%
39%
21%
12%
Opposition voters
37%
35%
13%
10%
The IDF receives high levels of trust, while trust in the IDF chief of staff is lower but remains relatively high.
Show data table
IndicatorGroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
IDFCoalition voters45%37%13%5%0%
IDFOpposition voters34%45%12%9%0%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirCoalition voters22%39%21%12%6%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirOpposition voters37%35%13%10%5%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know

IDF

Jewish public
39%
44%
13%
Arab public
20%
14%
20%
38%
8%

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir

Jewish public
29%
38%
18%
9%
Arab public
13%
15%
22%
36%
14%
The IDF receives high levels of trust, while trust in the IDF chief of staff is lower but remains relatively high.
Show data table
IndicatorGroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
IDFJewish public39%44%13%3%1%
IDFArab public20%14%20%38%8%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJewish public29%38%18%9%6%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirArab public13%15%22%36%14%
Trend over time
General sample

IDF

0%20%40%60%80%100%71%74%73%77%74%79%73%Jul 24Nov 24Mar 25Jul 25Nov 25Early Mar 26Jul 26
IDF

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir

0%20%40%60%80%100%35%56%60%63%63%68%59%Feb 25May 25Aug 25Nov 25Feb 26Apr 26Jul 26
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
IndicatorSurvey waveValue
IDFJul 2471%
IDFAug 2470%
IDFSep 2467%
IDFOct 2475%
IDFNov 2474%
IDFDec 2475%
IDFJan 2577%
IDFFeb 2566%
IDFMar 2573%
IDFApr 2576%
IDFMay 2576%
IDFJun 2583%
IDFJul 2577%
IDFAug 2575%
IDFSep 2575%
IDFOct 2578%
IDFNov 2574%
IDFDec 2575%
IDFJan 2673%
IDFFeb 2676%
IDFEarly Mar 2679%
IDFMid Mar 2677%
IDFLate Mar 2677%
IDFApr 2678%
IDFMay 2674%
IDFJun 2673%
IDFJul 2673%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirFeb 2535%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirMar 2550%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirApr 2554%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirMay 2556%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJun 2569%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJul 2562%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirAug 2560%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirSep 2558%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirOct 2563%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirNov 2563%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirDec 2558%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJan 2661%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirFeb 2663%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirEarly Mar 2671%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirLate Mar 2666%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirApr 2668%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirMay 2660%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJun 2662%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJul 2659%
Jewish public

IDF

0%20%40%60%80%100%90%87%88%76%77%93%90%90%83%Oct 23Dec 23 AApr 24Sep 24 AJan 25Jun 25 AOct 25Early Mar 26Jul 26
IDF

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir

0%20%40%60%80%100%42%68%70%73%73%78%67%Feb 25May 25Aug 25Nov 25Feb 26Apr 26Jul 26
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
IndicatorSurvey waveValue
IDFOct 2390%
IDFNov 23 A92%
IDFNov 23 B91%
IDFNov 23 C93%
IDFNov 23 D91%
IDFDec 23 A87%
IDFDec 23 B91%
IDFDec 23 C91%
IDFFeb 2486%
IDFMar 2488%
IDFApr 2488%
IDFMay 2482%
IDFJun 2484%
IDFJul 2478%
IDFAug 2478%
IDFSep 24 A76%
IDFSep 24 B87%
IDFOct 2485%
IDFNov 2485%
IDFDec 2485%
IDFJan 2577%
IDFFeb 2576%
IDFMar 2584%
IDFApr 2586%
IDFMay 2588%
IDFJun 25 A93%
IDFJun 25 B94%
IDFJul 2588%
IDFAug 2587%
IDFSep 2586%
IDFOct 2590%
IDFNov 2583%
IDFDec 2585%
IDFJan 2684%
IDFFeb 2685%
IDFEarly Mar 2690%
IDFMid Mar 2689%
IDFLate Mar 2688%
IDFApr 2689%
IDFMay 2685%
IDFJun 2684%
IDFJul 2683%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirFeb 2542%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirMar 2559%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirApr 2563%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirMay 2568%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJun 2581%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJul 2573%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirAug 2570%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirSep 2568%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirOct 2575%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirNov 2573%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirDec 2567%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJan 2671%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirFeb 2673%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirEarly Mar 2681%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirLate Mar 2676%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirApr 2678%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirMay 2669%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJun 2671%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJul 2667%
Arab public

IDF

0%20%40%60%80%100%47%40%34%35%29%32%28%34%Apr 24Aug 24Dec 24Apr 25Aug 25Dec 25Mid Mar 26Jul 26
IDF

IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir

0%20%40%60%80%100%9%10%21%23%25%25%28%Feb 25May 25Aug 25Nov 25Feb 26Apr 26Jul 26
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
IndicatorSurvey waveValue
IDFApr 2447%
IDFMay 2435%
IDFJun 2442%
IDFJul 2436%
IDFAug 2440%
IDFSep 2432%
IDFOct 2434%
IDFNov 2432%
IDFDec 2434%
IDFJan 2535%
IDFFeb 2526%
IDFMar 2530%
IDFApr 2535%
IDFMay 2526%
IDFJun 2537%
IDFJul 2534%
IDFAug 2529%
IDFSep 2529%
IDFOct 2532%
IDFNov 2537%
IDFDec 2532%
IDFJan 2628%
IDFFeb 2638%
IDFEarly Mar 2637%
IDFMid Mar 2628%
IDFLate Mar 2631%
IDFApr 2634%
IDFMay 2629%
IDFJun 2630%
IDFJul 2634%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirFeb 259%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirMar 2514%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirApr 2519%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirMay 2510%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJun 2523%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJul 2522%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirAug 2521%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirSep 2519%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirOct 2521%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirNov 2523%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirDec 2523%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJan 2619%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirFeb 2625%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirEarly Mar 2633%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirLate Mar 2627%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirApr 2625%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirMay 2622%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJun 2623%
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal ZamirJul 2628%
Back to topic selection

Trust in the Mossad and Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman

Security Institutions and Officials. The Mossad receives one of the highest trust levels, while this is the first direct measurement of trust in its director.

Seventy-four percent of the public express high trust in the Mossad, compared with 22 percent who report low trust. In the previous measurement, at the start of Operation “Rising Lion” in June 2025, 81 percent expressed high trust in the Mossad, a decline of 7 percentage points.

Forty-nine percent of the public express high trust in Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman, compared with 40 percent who report low trust; 11 percent answered “Don’t know.”

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know

Mossad

General sample
38%
36%
14%
8%

Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman

General sample
22%
27%
20%
20%
11%
The Mossad receives one of the highest trust levels, while trust in its director is lower.
Show data table
IndicatorGroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
MossadGeneral sample38%36%14%8%4%
Director of the Mossad Roman GofmanGeneral sample22%27%20%20%11%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know

Mossad

Coalition voters
45%
40%
10%
Opposition voters
41%
37%
14%

Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman

Coalition voters
37%
34%
13%
7%
9%
Opposition voters
14%
27%
25%
25%
9%
The Mossad receives one of the highest trust levels, while trust in its director is lower.
Show data table
IndicatorGroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
MossadCoalition voters45%40%10%4%1%
MossadOpposition voters41%37%14%6%2%
Director of the Mossad Roman GofmanCoalition voters37%34%13%7%9%
Director of the Mossad Roman GofmanOpposition voters14%27%25%25%9%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know

Mossad

Jewish public
42%
41%
12%
Arab public
19%
16%
23%
29%
13%

Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman

Jewish public
25%
30%
20%
14%
11%
Arab public
10%
12%
21%
44%
13%
The Mossad receives one of the highest trust levels, while trust in its director is lower.
Show data table
IndicatorGroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
MossadJewish public42%41%12%3%2%
MossadArab public19%16%23%29%13%
Director of the Mossad Roman GofmanJewish public25%30%20%14%11%
Director of the Mossad Roman GofmanArab public10%12%21%44%13%
Trend over time
General sample

Mossad

0%20%40%60%80%100%81%74%Jun 25Jul 26
Mossad

Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman

49%This is the first measurement, so no trend series is available yet.
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
IndicatorSurvey waveValue
MossadJun 2581%
MossadJul 2674%
Director of the Mossad Roman GofmanJuly 202649%
Jewish public

Mossad

0%20%40%60%80%100%92%83%Jun 25Jul 26
Mossad

Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman

55%This is the first measurement, so no trend series is available yet.
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
IndicatorSurvey waveValue
MossadJun 2592%
MossadJul 2683%
Director of the Mossad Roman GofmanJuly 202655%
Arab public

Mossad

0%20%40%60%80%100%38%35%Jun 25Jul 26
Mossad

Director of the Mossad Roman Gofman

22%This is the first measurement, so no trend series is available yet.
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
IndicatorSurvey waveValue
MossadJun 2538%
MossadJul 2635%
Director of the Mossad Roman GofmanJuly 202622%
Back to topic selection

Trust in the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) and its director David Zini

Security Institutions and Officials. Trust in the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) remains relatively high, while the public is divided over its director.

Sixty-one percent of the public express high trust in the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet), compared with 36 percent who report low trust. Forty-six percent express high trust in Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini, and an identical share express low trust.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know

Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)

General sample
25%
36%
23%
13%

Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini

General sample
22%
24%
21%
25%
8%
Trust in the Shin Bet is higher than trust in the director of the Shin Bet.
Show data table
IndicatorGroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)General sample25%36%23%13%3%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniGeneral sample22%24%21%25%8%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know

Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)

Coalition voters
31%
40%
21%
Opposition voters
25%
40%
24%
10%

Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini

Coalition voters
40%
31%
14%
7%
8%
Opposition voters
10%
22%
30%
31%
7%
Trust in the Shin Bet is higher than trust in the director of the Shin Bet.
Show data table
IndicatorGroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Coalition voters31%40%21%6%2%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Opposition voters25%40%24%10%1%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniCoalition voters40%31%14%7%8%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniOpposition voters10%22%30%31%7%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know

Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)

Jewish public
26%
42%
23%
Arab public
20%
11%
22%
41%

Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini

Jewish public
25%
27%
21%
19%
8%
Arab public
9%
11%
21%
49%
10%
Trust in the Shin Bet is higher than trust in the director of the Shin Bet.
Show data table
IndicatorGroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Jewish public26%42%23%6%3%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Arab public20%11%22%41%6%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniJewish public25%27%21%19%8%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniArab public9%11%21%49%10%
Trend over time
General sample

Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)

0%20%40%60%80%100%56%58%53%63%61%Feb 25Mar 25Apr 25Nov 25Jul 26
Shin Bet

Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini

0%20%40%60%80%100%52%49%46%Nov 25Jan 26Jul 26
Director of the Shin Bet David Zini
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
IndicatorSurvey waveValue
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Feb 2556%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Mar 2558%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Apr 2553%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Nov 2563%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Jul 2661%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniNov 2552%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniJan 2649%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniJul 2646%
Jewish public

Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)

0%20%40%60%80%100%64%65%59%71%68%Feb 25Mar 25Apr 25Nov 25Jul 26
Shin Bet

Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini

0%20%40%60%80%100%59%58%52%Nov 25Jan 26Jul 26
Director of the Shin Bet David Zini
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
IndicatorSurvey waveValue
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Feb 2564%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Mar 2565%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Apr 2559%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Nov 2571%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Jul 2668%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniNov 2559%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniJan 2658%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniJul 2652%
Arab public

Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)

0%20%40%60%80%100%26%30%27%33%31%Feb 25Mar 25Apr 25Nov 25Jul 26
Shin Bet

Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David Zini

0%20%40%60%80%100%28%15%20%Nov 25Jan 26Jul 26
Director of the Shin Bet David Zini
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
IndicatorSurvey waveValue
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Feb 2526%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Mar 2530%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Apr 2527%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Nov 2533%
Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet)Jul 2631%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniNov 2528%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniJan 2615%
Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet) David ZiniJul 2620%
Back to topic selection

To what extent do you have trust in each of the following entities? – IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)

Security Institutions and Officials. Trust in the IDF Intelligence Directorate remains relatively high but has declined relative to the previous measurement.

Sixty-two percent of the public express high trust in the IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman), compared with 33 percent who report low trust. This is an 11-percentage-point decline from the previous measurement, conducted during the first days of Operation “Lion’s Roar,” when 74 percent expressed high trust.

Political breakdown: 73 percent of opposition voters express high trust in the IDF Intelligence Directorate, compared with 65 percent of coalition voters.

Population-group breakdown: 70 percent of the Jewish public express high trust in the IDF Intelligence Directorate, compared with only 33 percent of the Arab public.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
General sample
20%
42%
22%
11%
63% express a high level of trust in Aman.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
General sample20%42%22%11%5%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Coalition voters
22%
43%
24%
8%
Opposition voters
22%
51%
17%
7%
63% express a high level of trust in Aman.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Coalition voters22%43%24%8%3%
Opposition voters22%51%17%7%3%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Jewish public
21%
49%
21%
Arab public
18%
15%
24%
28%
15%
63% express a high level of trust in Aman.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Jewish public21%49%21%6%3%
Arab public18%15%24%28%15%
Trend over time
General sample
Measure shownIDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
0%20%40%60%80%100%52%56%51%63%61%74%64%62%Jul 24Aug 24Sep 24Oct 24Dec 24Jun 25Oct 25Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveIDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
Jul 2452%
Aug 2456%
Sep 2451%
Oct 2463%
Dec 2461%
Jun 2574%
Oct 2564%
Jul 2662%
Jewish public
Measure shownIDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
0%20%40%60%80%100%55%62%57%71%68%83%72%70%Jul 24Aug 24Sep 24Oct 24Dec 24Jun 25Oct 25Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveIDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
Jul 2455%
Aug 2462%
Sep 2457%
Oct 2471%
Dec 2468%
Jun 2583%
Oct 2572%
Jul 2670%
Arab public
Measure shownIDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
IDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
0%20%40%60%80%100%35%35%26%32%31%39%30%33%Jul 24Aug 24Sep 24Oct 24Dec 24Jun 25Oct 25Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveIDF Intelligence Directorate (Aman)
Jul 2435%
Aug 2435%
Sep 2426%
Oct 2432%
Dec 2431%
Jun 2539%
Oct 2530%
Jul 2633%
Back to topic selection

Political Leadership

4 questions

To what extent do you have trust in each of the following entities? – Government of Israel

Political leadership. Trust in the political leadership remains low and highly polarized. After the increase recorded during the first days of Operation Rising Lion, trust in the government and the prime minister stabilized at lower levels.

26% of the public express high trust in the Government of Israel, compared with 73% reporting low trust. Compared with June and May this is stable, but compared with the beginning of Operation Rising Lion it declined from 34% to 26%.

Political breakdown: 55% of coalition voters express high trust in the government, compared with only 6% among opposition voters. Sector breakdown: 31% of Jews express high trust, compared with only 5% among Arabs.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
General sample
10%
15%
22%
51%
Only 26% express a high level of trust in the government.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
General sample10%15%22%51%2%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Coalition voters
23%
32%
27%
17%
Opposition voters
17%
77%
Only 26% express a high level of trust in the government.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Coalition voters23%32%27%17%1%
Opposition voters1%5%17%77%0%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Jewish public
12%
19%
23%
45%
Arab public
16%
75%
Only 26% express a high level of trust in the government.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Jewish public12%19%23%45%1%
Arab public4%1%16%75%4%
Trend over time
General sample
Measure shownGovernment of Israel
Government of Israel
0%20%40%60%80%100%17%21%23%23%26%34%25%Jul 24Nov 24Mar 25Jul 25Nov 25Early Mar 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveGovernment of Israel
Jul 2417%
Aug 2417%
Sep 2419%
Oct 2421%
Nov 2421%
Dec 2422%
Jan 2520%
Feb 2521%
Mar 2523%
Apr 2524%
May 2521%
Jun 2532%
Jul 2523%
Aug 2523%
Sep 2526%
Oct 2527%
Nov 2526%
Dec 2523%
Jan 2627%
Feb 2630%
Early Mar 2634%
Mid Mar 2631%
Late Mar 2630%
Apr 2630%
May 2626%
Jun 2625%
Jul 2625%
Jewish public
Measure shownGovernment of Israel
Government of Israel
0%20%40%60%80%100%26%20%20%23%36%32%40%31%Oct 23Mar 24Aug 24Jan 25Jun 25 AOct 25Early Mar 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveGovernment of Israel
Oct 2326%
Nov 23 A24%
Nov 23 B23%
Dec 23 A23%
Feb 2424%
Mar 2420%
Apr 2424%
May 2422%
Jun 2427%
Jul 2418%
Aug 2420%
Sep 24 A22%
Oct 2425%
Nov 2425%
Dec 2425%
Jan 2523%
Feb 2525%
Mar 2528%
Apr 2528%
May 2526%
Jun 25 A36%
Jun 25 B39%
Jul 2527%
Aug 2528%
Sep 2530%
Oct 2532%
Nov 2530%
Dec 2526%
Jan 2632%
Feb 2633%
Early Mar 2640%
Mid Mar 2638%
Late Mar 2636%
Apr 2636%
May 2632%
Jun 2631%
Jul 2631%
Arab public
Measure shownGovernment of Israel
Government of Israel
0%20%40%60%80%100%19%9%9%8%6%9%6%5%Apr 24Aug 24Dec 24Apr 25Aug 25Dec 25Mid Mar 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveGovernment of Israel
Apr 2419%
May 2410%
Jun 2412%
Jul 247%
Aug 249%
Sep 246%
Oct 247%
Nov 247%
Dec 249%
Jan 259%
Feb 257%
Mar 255%
Apr 258%
May 254%
Jun 256%
Jul 259%
Aug 256%
Sep 259%
Oct 258%
Nov 259%
Dec 259%
Jan 269%
Feb 2616%
Early Mar 269%
Mid Mar 266%
Late Mar 268%
Apr 267%
May 265%
Jun 264%
Jul 265%
Back to topic selection

To what extent do you have trust in each of the following figures? – Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu

Political leadership. Trust in the prime minister remains low and polarized, with little change in recent months.

31% of the public express high trust in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, compared with 67% reporting low trust. The level of high trust is the same as in June and close to the May figure, but lower than at the beginning of Operation Rising Lion.

Political breakdown: 68% of coalition voters express high trust in the prime minister, compared with only 6% among opposition voters. Sector breakdown: 37% of Jews express high trust, compared with only 6% among Arabs.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
General sample
16%
15%
14%
53%
31% express a high level of trust in the prime minister.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
General sample16%15%14%53%2%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Coalition voters
36%
32%
16%
14%
Opposition voters
13%
81%
31% express a high level of trust in the prime minister.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Coalition voters36%32%16%14%2%
Opposition voters2%4%13%81%0%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Jewish public
18%
19%
16%
45%
Arab public
7%
84%
31% express a high level of trust in the prime minister.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Jewish public18%19%16%45%2%
Arab public5%1%7%84%3%
Trend over time
General sample
Measure shownPrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
0%20%40%60%80%100%25%28%29%30%34%38%31%Jul 24Nov 24Mar 25Jul 25Nov 25Early Mar 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey wavePrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Jul 2425%
Aug 2426%
Sep 2425%
Oct 2428%
Nov 2428%
Dec 2433%
Jan 2527%
Feb 2527%
Mar 2529%
Apr 2529%
May 2526%
Jun 2535%
Jul 2530%
Aug 2530%
Sep 2530%
Oct 2533%
Nov 2534%
Dec 2531%
Jan 2636%
Feb 2634%
Early Mar 2638%
Late Mar 2636%
Apr 2632%
May 2633%
Jun 2631%
Jul 2631%
Jewish public
Measure shownPrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
0%20%40%60%80%100%28%27%31%33%31%39%46%37%Oct 23Mar 24Aug 24Dec 24May 25Oct 25Early Mar 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey wavePrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Oct 2328%
Nov 23 A28%
Nov 23 B31%
Dec 2326%
Feb 2430%
Mar 2427%
Apr 2430%
May 2428%
Jun 2435%
Jul 2429%
Aug 2431%
Sep 24 A30%
Sep 24 B37%
Oct 2433%
Nov 2434%
Dec 2433%
Jan 2533%
Feb 2532%
Mar 2535%
Apr 2534%
May 2531%
Jun 2537%
Jul 2536%
Aug 2536%
Sep 2536%
Oct 2539%
Nov 2541%
Dec 2537%
Jan 2642%
Feb 2641%
Early Mar 2646%
Late Mar 2643%
Apr 2639%
May 2640%
Jun 2637%
Jul 2637%
Arab public
Measure shownPrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
0%20%40%60%80%100%12%7%8%8%6%6%8%6%Apr 24Aug 24Dec 24Apr 25Aug 25Dec 25Late Mar 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey wavePrime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
Apr 2412%
May 249%
Jun 249%
Jul 248%
Aug 247%
Sep 245%
Oct 247%
Nov 247%
Dec 248%
Jan 257%
Feb 257%
Mar 253%
Apr 258%
May 253%
Jun 257%
Jul 257%
Aug 256%
Sep 255%
Oct 257%
Nov 259%
Dec 256%
Jan 2610%
Feb 268%
Early Mar 267%
Late Mar 268%
Apr 265%
May 266%
Jun 266%
Jul 266%
Back to topic selection

To what extent do you have trust in each of the following figures? – Minister of Defense Israel Katz

Political leadership. Trust in the minister of defense remains low, despite an increase compared with the previous measurement.

29% of the public express high trust in Minister of Defense Israel Katz, compared with 64% reporting low trust. Compared with the previous measurement in December 2025, this is a 6-point increase, but trust remains low.

Political breakdown: 60% of coalition voters express high trust in the minister of defense, compared with only 10% among opposition voters. Sector breakdown: 34% of Jews express high trust, compared with only 11% among Arabs.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
General sample
11%
19%
19%
45%
29% express a high level of trust in the minister of defense.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
General sample11%19%19%45%6%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Coalition voters
22%
37%
20%
14%
7%
Opposition voters
7%
17%
70%
29% express a high level of trust in the minister of defense.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Coalition voters22%37%20%14%7%
Opposition voters3%7%17%70%3%
Trust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Jewish public
12%
22%
19%
41%
Arab public
17%
65%
7%
29% express a high level of trust in the minister of defense.
Show data table
GroupTrust to a large extentTrust to a fairly large extentTrust to a small extentDo not trustDon't know
Jewish public12%22%19%41%6%
Arab public6%5%17%65%7%
Trend over time
General sample
Measure shownMinister of Defense Israel Katz
Minister of Defense Israel Katz
0%20%40%60%80%100%20%23%23%24%25%32%29%23%30%Nov 24Dec 24Jan 25Feb 25Mar 25Jun 25Nov 25Dec 25Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveMinister of Defense Israel Katz
Nov 2420%
Dec 2423%
Jan 2523%
Feb 2524%
Mar 2525%
Jun 2532%
Nov 2529%
Dec 2523%
Jul 2630%
Jewish public
Measure shownMinister of Defense Israel Katz
Minister of Defense Israel Katz
0%20%40%60%80%100%23%26%26%28%30%27%33%27%34%Nov 24Dec 24Jan 25Feb 25Mar 25Jun 25Nov 25Dec 25Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveMinister of Defense Israel Katz
Nov 2423%
Dec 2426%
Jan 2526%
Feb 2528%
Mar 2530%
Jun 2527%
Nov 2533%
Dec 2527%
Jul 2634%
Arab public
Measure shownMinister of Defense Israel Katz
Minister of Defense Israel Katz
0%20%40%60%80%100%8%11%9%9%6%8%13%9%11%Nov 24Dec 24Jan 25Feb 25Mar 25Jun 25Nov 25Dec 25Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveMinister of Defense Israel Katz
Nov 248%
Dec 2411%
Jan 259%
Feb 259%
Mar 256%
Jun 258%
Nov 2513%
Dec 259%
Jul 2611%
Back to topic selection

To what extent do you agree with the following statement: “Decisions made by the political leadership on national security issues are based primarily on security considerations rather than political or personal considerations.”

A majority of the public does not agree that decisions made by the political leadership on national security issues are based primarily on security considerations rather than political or personal considerations.

Fifty-six percent disagree with the statement: 30 percent “somewhat disagree” and 26 percent “strongly disagree.” By contrast, 39 percent agree with the statement.

Political breakdown: 64 percent of coalition voters agree that decisions made by the political leadership are based primarily on security considerations, compared with only 17 percent of opposition voters.

Population-group breakdown: 55 percent of the Jewish public and 60 percent of the Arab public disagree with the statement.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeDon't know
General sample
26%
30%
23%
16%
56% disagree that decisions by the political leadership are based mainly on security considerations.
Show data table
GroupStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeDon't know
General sample26%30%23%16%5%
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeDon't know
Coalition voters
9%
23%
33%
31%
Opposition voters
42%
38%
11%
56% disagree that decisions by the political leadership are based mainly on security considerations.
Show data table
GroupStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeDon't know
Coalition voters9%23%33%31%4%
Opposition voters42%38%11%6%3%
Strongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeDon't know
Jewish public
22%
32%
23%
19%
Arab public
40%
20%
26%
10%
56% disagree that decisions by the political leadership are based mainly on security considerations.
Show data table
GroupStrongly disagreeSomewhat disagreeSomewhat agreeStrongly agreeDon't know
Jewish public22%32%23%19%4%
Arab public40%20%26%4%10%
Trend over time
General sample
Strongly disagree
Strongly disagree
0%20%40%60%80%100%30%26%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly disagree
November 202530%
July 202626%
Somewhat disagree
Somewhat disagree
0%20%40%60%80%100%29%30%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat disagree
November 202529%
July 202630%
Somewhat agree
Somewhat agree
0%20%40%60%80%100%26%23%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat agree
November 202526%
July 202623%
Strongly agree
Strongly agree
0%20%40%60%80%100%12%16%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly agree
November 202512%
July 202616%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%4%5%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
November 20254%
July 20265%
Jewish public
Strongly disagree
Strongly disagree
0%20%40%60%80%100%28%23%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly disagree
November 202528%
July 202623%
Somewhat disagree
Somewhat disagree
0%20%40%60%80%100%29%32%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat disagree
November 202529%
July 202632%
Somewhat agree
Somewhat agree
0%20%40%60%80%100%25%23%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat agree
November 202525%
July 202623%
Strongly agree
Strongly agree
0%20%40%60%80%100%14%19%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly agree
November 202514%
July 202619%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%4%4%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
November 20254%
July 20264%
Arab public
Strongly disagree
Strongly disagree
0%20%40%60%80%100%35%41%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly disagree
November 202535%
July 202641%
Somewhat disagree
Somewhat disagree
0%20%40%60%80%100%31%20%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat disagree
November 202531%
July 202620%
Somewhat agree
Somewhat agree
0%20%40%60%80%100%26%26%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat agree
November 202526%
July 202626%
Strongly agree
Strongly agree
0%20%40%60%80%100%5%5%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly agree
November 20255%
July 20265%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%3%10%November 2025July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
November 20253%
July 202610%
Back to topic selection

Threat Perceptions

Assessment of Israel’s national security situation and personal sense of security in July 2026.

Situation Assessment

2 questions

How do you evaluate Israel’s national security situation today? (1 = very bad situation, 5 = very good situation)

Perceptions of threats and challenges. Compared with June, there is a certain improvement in the assessment of Israel’s national security situation.

37% rate the national security situation as bad or very bad, 36% as moderate, and 26% as good or very good. Compared with June, the share rating the situation as bad or very bad fell from 42% to 37%, while the share rating it as good or very good rose from 20% to 26%.

Political breakdown: 48% of coalition voters rate the national security situation as good or very good, compared with only 11% among opposition voters. Sector breakdown: 29% of Jews rate it as good or very good, compared with 14% among Arabs.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
5 – Very good situation4321 – Very bad situationDon't know
General sample
14%
23%
36%
20%
37% rate the national security situation as bad or very bad, while 26% rate it as good or very good.
Show data table
Group5 – Very good situation4321 – Very bad situationDon't know
General sample14%23%36%20%6%1%
5 – Very good situation4321 – Very bad situationDon't know
Coalition voters
11%
34%
38%
11%
Opposition voters
20%
34%
36%
8%
37% rate the national security situation as bad or very bad, while 26% rate it as good or very good.
Show data table
Group5 – Very good situation4321 – Very bad situationDon't know
Coalition voters5%11%34%38%11%1%
Opposition voters20%34%36%8%2%0%
5 – Very good situation4321 – Very bad situationDon't know
Jewish public
11%
22%
37%
22%
7%
Arab public
27%
23%
35%
10%
37% rate the national security situation as bad or very bad, while 26% rate it as good or very good.
Show data table
Group5 – Very good situation4321 – Very bad situationDon't know
Jewish public11%22%37%22%7%1%
Arab public27%23%35%10%3%2%
Trend over time
General sample
Good or very good
Good or very good
0%20%40%60%80%100%29%28%32%30%38%29%26%20%26%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveGood or very good
Nov 2529%
Dec 2528%
Jan 2632%
Feb 2630%
Mar 2638%
Apr 2629%
May 2626%
Jun 2620%
Jul 2626%
Moderate
Moderate
0%20%40%60%80%100%44%40%37%37%34%35%38%37%36%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveModerate
Nov 2544%
Dec 2540%
Jan 2637%
Feb 2637%
Mar 2634%
Apr 2635%
May 2638%
Jun 2637%
Jul 2636%
Bad or very bad
Bad or very bad
0%20%40%60%80%100%27%32%31%31%27%35%34%42%37%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveBad or very bad
Nov 2527%
Dec 2532%
Jan 2631%
Feb 2631%
Mar 2627%
Apr 2635%
May 2634%
Jun 2642%
Jul 2637%
Don’t know
Don’t know
0%20%40%60%80%100%1%1%1%2%1%1%2%1%1%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveDon’t know
Nov 251%
Dec 251%
Jan 261%
Feb 262%
Mar 261%
Apr 261%
May 262%
Jun 261%
Jul 261%
Average
Average
02468105.85.75.85.76.15.75.55.25.5Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveAverage
Nov 255.8
Dec 255.7
Jan 265.8
Feb 265.7
Mar 266.1
Apr 265.7
May 265.5
Jun 265.2
Jul 265.5
Jewish public
Good or very good
Good or very good
0%20%40%60%80%100%31%31%38%33%45%34%31%24%29%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveGood or very good
Nov 2531%
Dec 2531%
Jan 2638%
Feb 2633%
Mar 2645%
Apr 2634%
May 2631%
Jun 2624%
Jul 2629%
Moderate
Moderate
0%20%40%60%80%100%44%40%37%38%35%36%38%37%37%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveModerate
Nov 2544%
Dec 2540%
Jan 2637%
Feb 2638%
Mar 2635%
Apr 2636%
May 2638%
Jun 2637%
Jul 2637%
Bad or very bad
Bad or very bad
0%20%40%60%80%100%23%28%24%28%19%29%30%38%33%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveBad or very bad
Nov 2523%
Dec 2528%
Jan 2624%
Feb 2628%
Mar 2619%
Apr 2629%
May 2630%
Jun 2638%
Jul 2633%
Don’t know
Don’t know
0%20%40%60%80%100%1%1%1%2%1%1%1%1%1%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon’t know
Nov 251%
Dec 251%
Jan 261%
Feb 262%
Mar 261%
Apr 261%
May 261%
Jun 261%
Jul 261%
Average
Average
02468106.05.96.15.96.56.15.95.45.7Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveAverage
Nov 256.0
Dec 255.9
Jan 266.1
Feb 265.9
Mar 266.5
Apr 266.1
May 265.9
Jun 265.4
Jul 265.7
Arab public
Good or very good
Good or very good
0%20%40%60%80%100%17%15%9%17%11%8%6%6%13%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveGood or very good
Nov 2517%
Dec 2515%
Jan 269%
Feb 2617%
Mar 2611%
Apr 268%
May 266%
Jun 266%
Jul 2613%
Moderate
Moderate
0%20%40%60%80%100%41%38%35%35%30%32%38%35%35%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveModerate
Nov 2541%
Dec 2538%
Jan 2635%
Feb 2635%
Mar 2630%
Apr 2632%
May 2638%
Jun 2635%
Jul 2635%
Bad or very bad
Bad or very bad
0%20%40%60%80%100%42%45%54%47%58%59%51%57%50%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveBad or very bad
Nov 2542%
Dec 2545%
Jan 2654%
Feb 2647%
Mar 2658%
Apr 2659%
May 2651%
Jun 2657%
Jul 2650%
Don’t know
Don’t know
0%20%40%60%80%100%0%2%3%1%1%2%5%2%2%Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon’t know
Nov 250%
Dec 252%
Jan 263%
Feb 261%
Mar 261%
Apr 262%
May 265%
Jun 262%
Jul 262%
Average
Average
02468105.04.84.44.94.54.34.34.34.7Nov 25Dec 25Jan 26Feb 26Mar 26Apr 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveAverage
Nov 255.0
Dec 254.8
Jan 264.4
Feb 264.9
Mar 264.5
Apr 264.3
May 264.3
Jun 264.3
Jul 264.7
Back to topic selection

What is your level of personal sense of security these days?

Perceptions of Threats and Challenges. The personal sense of security has remained stable relative to June.

Thirty-one percent of the public report a high or very high personal sense of security, 41 percent report a moderate sense of security, and 28 percent report a low or very low sense of security.

Political breakdown: 52 percent of coalition voters report a high personal sense of security, compared with only 16 percent of opposition voters.

Population-group breakdown: 36 percent of the Jewish public report a high personal sense of security, compared with only 9 percent of the Arab public.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Very highHighModerateLowVery lowDon't know
General sample
26%
40%
19%
9%
30% report a high or very high sense of personal security; the measure is stable compared to June.
Show data table
GroupVery highHighModerateLowVery lowDon't know
General sample5%26%40%19%9%1%
Very highHighModerateLowVery lowDon't know
Coalition voters
8%
44%
32%
10%
Opposition voters
13%
48%
26%
9%
30% report a high or very high sense of personal security; the measure is stable compared to June.
Show data table
GroupVery highHighModerateLowVery lowDon't know
Coalition voters8%44%32%10%5%1%
Opposition voters3%13%48%26%9%1%
Very highHighModerateLowVery lowDon't know
Jewish public
30%
40%
17%
Arab public
7%
41%
29%
20%
30% report a high or very high sense of personal security; the measure is stable compared to June.
Show data table
GroupVery highHighModerateLowVery lowDon't know
Jewish public6%30%40%17%6%1%
Arab public1%7%41%29%20%2%
Trend over time
General sample
Measure shownAverage
Average
02468105.45.55.96.06.06.25.85.9Jul 24Oct 24Jan 25Apr 25Jul 25Oct 25Jan 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveAverage
Jul 245.4
Aug 245.5
Sep 245.4
Oct 245.5
Nov 245.5
Dec 245.8
Jan 255.9
Feb 255.9
Mar 255.6
Apr 256.0
May 255.9
Jun 255.6
Jul 256.0
Aug 256.0
Sep 255.8
Oct 256.2
Nov 255.9
Dec 255.9
Jan 265.8
Feb 265.9
Mar 265.6
May 266.0
Jun 265.8
Jul 265.9
Jewish public
Measure shownAverage
Average
02468105.76.06.26.46.46.56.16.1Jul 24Oct 24Jan 25Apr 25Jul 25Oct 25Jan 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveAverage
Jul 245.7
Aug 245.9
Sep 245.7
Oct 246.0
Nov 245.9
Dec 246.2
Jan 256.2
Feb 256.1
Mar 255.8
Apr 256.4
May 256.2
Jun 256.1
Jul 256.4
Aug 256.3
Sep 256.2
Oct 256.5
Nov 256.3
Dec 256.2
Jan 266.1
Feb 266.3
Mar 266.0
May 266.3
Jun 266.2
Jul 266.1
Arab public
Measure shownAverage
Average
02468103.93.65.04.74.54.94.54.7Jul 24Oct 24Jan 25Apr 25Jul 25Oct 25Jan 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveAverage
Jul 243.9
Aug 244.0
Sep 244.1
Oct 243.6
Nov 243.7
Dec 244.4
Jan 255.0
Feb 254.9
Mar 254.6
Apr 254.7
May 254.7
Jun 253.6
Jul 254.5
Aug 254.7
Sep 254.2
Oct 254.9
Nov 254.4
Dec 254.7
Jan 264.5
Feb 264.6
Mar 264.1
May 264.8
Jun 264.4
Jul 264.7
Back to topic selection

External Threats

Public positions regarding Iran, Lebanon, and the strategic relationship with the United States.

Iran

8 questions

To what extent do you support or oppose a preemptive Israeli strike against Iran at this time?

Iran arena. The public is divided regarding an Israeli preemptive strike against Iran, while expressing broad skepticism about the ability of another campaign to achieve its central goals.

42% support an Israeli preemptive strike against Iran at this time — 22% somewhat support and 20% strongly support — compared with 46% who oppose it. 12% answered “Don’t know.” Compared with January 2026 there was no meaningful change, but a slight shift toward opposition is evident.

Political breakdown: 64% of coalition voters support a preemptive strike, compared with only 31% among opposition voters. Sector breakdown: 49% of Jews support it, compared with only 15% among Arabs.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Strongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
General sample
22%
24%
22%
20%
12%
The public is split on an Israeli preemptive strike against Iran: 42% support it and 46% oppose it.
Show data table
GroupStrongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
General sample22%24%22%20%12%
Strongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
Coalition voters
19%
31%
33%
12%
Opposition voters
27%
31%
18%
12%
12%
The public is split on an Israeli preemptive strike against Iran: 42% support it and 46% oppose it.
Show data table
GroupStrongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
Coalition voters5%19%31%33%12%
Opposition voters27%31%18%12%12%
Strongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
Jewish public
13%
26%
25%
23%
13%
Arab public
56%
21%
10%
8%
The public is split on an Israeli preemptive strike against Iran: 42% support it and 46% oppose it.
Show data table
GroupStrongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
Jewish public13%26%25%23%13%
Arab public56%21%10%5%8%
Trend over time
General sample
Strongly support
Strongly support
0%20%40%60%80%100%18%22%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly support
January 202618%
July 202622%
Somewhat support
Somewhat support
0%20%40%60%80%100%25%25%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat support
January 202625%
July 202625%
Somewhat oppose
Somewhat oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%27%22%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat oppose
January 202627%
July 202622%
Strongly oppose
Strongly oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%18%20%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly oppose
January 202618%
July 202620%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%12%12%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
January 202612%
July 202612%
Jewish public
Strongly support
Strongly support
0%20%40%60%80%100%11%13%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly support
January 202611%
July 202613%
Somewhat support
Somewhat support
0%20%40%60%80%100%26%25%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat support
January 202626%
July 202625%
Somewhat oppose
Somewhat oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%29%25%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat oppose
January 202629%
July 202625%
Strongly oppose
Strongly oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%22%23%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly oppose
January 202622%
July 202623%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%12%13%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
January 202612%
July 202613%
Arab public
Strongly support
Strongly support
0%20%40%60%80%100%46%56%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly support
January 202646%
July 202656%
Somewhat support
Somewhat support
0%20%40%60%80%100%21%21%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat support
January 202621%
July 202621%
Somewhat oppose
Somewhat oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%17%10%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat oppose
January 202617%
July 202610%
Strongly oppose
Strongly oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%3%5%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly oppose
January 20263%
July 20265%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%13%8%January 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
January 202613%
July 20268%
Back to topic selection

In your opinion, how will another campaign against Iran affect the achievement of each of the following potential objectives?

Iran. The public is broadly skeptical that another campaign would achieve the main objectives. Although question wording and response scales changed across survey waves, the sequence indicates a marked moderation in expectations.

Only 7 percent believe that another campaign against Iran would fully dismantle the nuclear program, and another 22 percent believe that dismantling the program would be mostly achieved. Across the other objectives, only a minority believe the objectives would be fully or mostly achieved.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Will be fully achievedWill be mostly achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Click an objective name to open the full question and all available breakdowns.
Show data table
ObjectiveWill be fully achievedWill be mostly achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Dismantling the nuclear program7%22%30%33%8%
Toppling the Ayatollah regime6%14%23%48%9%
Dismantling the ballistic missile array7%21%31%35%6%
Ceasing support for terrorist organizations6%14%23%49%8%
Reaching an agreement with Iran that is favorable to Israel5%12%23%49%11%
Back to topic selection

In your opinion, how will another campaign against Iran affect the achievement of each of the following potential objectives? – Dismantling the nuclear program

Only 29% estimate that another campaign against Iran would fully or mostly dismantle the nuclear project, while 63% believe the goal would be achieved only partially or not at all.

Trend: At the beginning of Operation Rising Lion, 62.5% believed the nuclear project would be significantly damaged or fully dismantled. In April, after the operation ended, only 30% believed the project had been significantly damaged or dismantled. Now, only 29% believe another campaign would fully or mostly dismantle it.

Political breakdown: 50% of coalition voters believe the goal would be fully or mostly achieved, compared with only 12% among opposition voters. Sector breakdown: 33% of Jews believe so, compared with 15% among Arabs.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
General sample
7%
22%
30%
33%
8%
Only 29% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly dismantle Iran’s nuclear project.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
General sample7%22%30%33%8%
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Coalition voters
11%
38%
29%
17%
Opposition voters
9%
35%
48%
Only 29% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly dismantle Iran’s nuclear project.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Coalition voters11%38%29%17%5%
Opposition voters3%9%35%48%5%
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Jewish public
8%
25%
31%
31%
Arab public
13%
27%
41%
17%
Only 29% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly dismantle Iran’s nuclear project.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Jewish public8%25%31%31%5%
Arab public2%13%27%41%17%
Back to topic selection

In your opinion, how will another campaign against Iran affect the achievement of each of the following potential objectives? – Toppling the Ayatollah regime

Only 20% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly topple the ayatollah regime, while 71% believe this goal would be achieved only partially or not at all. 9% answered “Don’t know.”

Trend: At the beginning of Operation Rising Lion, 69% believed the regime would be significantly harmed or collapse entirely. In April, after the operation, only 31% believed the regime had been significantly harmed or collapsed. Today, only 20% expect another campaign to fully or mostly topple it.

Political breakdown: 35% of coalition voters believe this goal would be fully or mostly achieved, compared with only 9% among opposition voters. Sector breakdown: 23% of Jews believe so, compared with only 5% among Arabs.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
General sample
14%
23%
48%
9%
Only 20% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly topple the ayatollah regime.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
General sample6%14%23%48%9%
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Coalition voters
12%
23%
29%
28%
8%
Opposition voters
7%
20%
68%
Only 20% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly topple the ayatollah regime.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Coalition voters12%23%29%28%8%
Opposition voters1%7%20%68%4%
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Jewish public
7%
16%
23%
47%
7%
Arab public
23%
56%
17%
Only 20% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly topple the ayatollah regime.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Jewish public7%16%23%47%7%
Arab public1%3%23%56%17%
Back to topic selection

In your opinion, how will another campaign against Iran affect the achievement of each of the following potential objectives? – Dismantling the ballistic missile array

28% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly dismantle Iran’s ballistic missile array, while 65% believe this goal would be achieved only partially or not at all.

Trend: At the beginning of Operation Rising Lion, 73% believed the missile array would be significantly damaged or fully dismantled. After the operation, in April, only 42% believed the array had been significantly damaged or dismantled. Today, only 28% expect another campaign to fully or mostly dismantle it.

Political breakdown: 52% of coalition voters believe this goal would be fully or mostly achieved, compared with only 12% among opposition voters. Sector breakdown: 34% of Jews believe so, compared with only 7% among Arabs.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
General sample
7%
21%
31%
35%
28% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly dismantle Iran’s ballistic missile array.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
General sample7%21%31%35%6%
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Coalition voters
14%
39%
27%
16%
Opposition voters
9%
36%
49%
28% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly dismantle Iran’s ballistic missile array.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Coalition voters14%39%27%16%4%
Opposition voters2%9%36%49%4%
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Jewish public
8%
25%
31%
32%
Arab public
29%
47%
17%
28% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly dismantle Iran’s ballistic missile array.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Jewish public8%25%31%32%4%
Arab public4%3%29%47%17%
Back to topic selection

In your opinion, how will another campaign against Iran affect the achievement of each of the following potential objectives? – Ceasing support for terrorist organizations

Only 21% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly end Iranian support for terrorist organizations, while 72% believe this goal would be achieved only partially or not at all.

Political breakdown: 37% of coalition voters believe this goal would be fully or mostly achieved, compared with only 9% among opposition voters. Sector breakdown: 23% of Jews believe so, compared with 10% among Arabs.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
General sample
14%
23%
49%
8%
Only 21% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly end Iranian support for terrorist organizations.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
General sample6%14%23%49%8%
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Coalition voters
13%
24%
24%
32%
7%
Opposition voters
7%
23%
64%
Only 21% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly end Iranian support for terrorist organizations.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Coalition voters13%24%24%32%7%
Opposition voters2%7%23%64%4%
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Jewish public
8%
15%
23%
49%
Arab public
9%
23%
49%
17%
Only 21% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly end Iranian support for terrorist organizations.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Jewish public8%15%23%49%5%
Arab public2%9%23%49%17%
Back to topic selection

In your opinion, how will another campaign against Iran affect the achievement of each of the following potential objectives? – Reaching an agreement with Iran that is favorable to Israel

Only 16% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly lead to an agreement with Iran that is good for Israel, while 72% believe the goal would be achieved only partially or not at all. 11% answered “Don’t know.”

Political breakdown: 23% of coalition voters believe a good agreement would be achieved fully or mostly, compared with 12% among opposition voters. Sector breakdown: 15% of Jews believe so, compared with 18% among Arabs; among Arabs, 22% answered “Don’t know.”

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
General sample
12%
23%
49%
11%
Only 16% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly lead to an agreement with Iran that is good for Israel.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
General sample5%12%23%49%11%
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Coalition voters
8%
15%
22%
47%
8%
Opposition voters
10%
23%
55%
10%
Only 16% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly lead to an agreement with Iran that is good for Israel.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Coalition voters8%15%22%47%8%
Opposition voters2%10%23%55%10%
Will be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Jewish public
11%
22%
54%
9%
Arab public
13%
28%
32%
22%
Only 16% estimate that another campaign would fully or mostly lead to an agreement with Iran that is good for Israel.
Show data table
GroupWill be fully achievedWill mostly be achievedWill be partially achievedWill not be achievedDon't know
Jewish public4%11%22%54%9%
Arab public5%13%28%32%22%
Back to topic selection

To what extent would you support Israeli military action in Iran, even at the cost of a confrontation with President Trump?

Iran / Israel–U.S. Relations. Support for Israeli military action in Iran even at the cost of a confrontation with President Trump fell sharply relative to June.

Thirty-six percent of the public support Israeli military action in Iran even at the cost of a confrontation with President Trump, compared with 53 percent who oppose it; 11 percent answered “Don’t know.” Support fell from 52 percent in June to 36 percent in July.

Political breakdown: 58 percent of coalition voters support military action even at the cost of a confrontation with Trump, compared with only 24 percent of opposition voters.

Population-group breakdown: 43 percent of the Jewish public support such action, compared with only 7 percent of the Arab public.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Strongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
General sample
13%
23%
26%
27%
11%
Support for military action in Iran even at the cost of confrontation with President Trump fell from 52% in June to 36% today.
Show data table
GroupStrongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
General sample13%23%26%27%11%
Strongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
Coalition voters
23%
35%
22%
9%
11%
Opposition voters
18%
29%
37%
10%
Support for military action in Iran even at the cost of confrontation with President Trump fell from 52% in June to 36% today.
Show data table
GroupStrongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
Coalition voters23%35%22%9%11%
Opposition voters6%18%29%37%10%
Strongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
Jewish public
15%
28%
26%
19%
12%
Arab public
27%
58%
8%
Support for military action in Iran even at the cost of confrontation with President Trump fell from 52% in June to 36% today.
Show data table
GroupStrongly supportSomewhat supportSomewhat opposeStrongly opposeDon't know
Jewish public15%28%26%19%12%
Arab public2%5%27%58%8%
Trend over time
General sample
Strongly support
Strongly support
0%20%40%60%80%100%22%13%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly support
June 202622%
July 202613%
Somewhat support
Somewhat support
0%20%40%60%80%100%30%24%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat support
June 202630%
July 202624%
Somewhat oppose
Somewhat oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%19%26%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat oppose
June 202619%
July 202626%
Strongly oppose
Strongly oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%16%27%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly oppose
June 202616%
July 202627%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%13%11%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
June 202613%
July 202611%
Jewish public
Strongly support
Strongly support
0%20%40%60%80%100%26%15%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly support
June 202626%
July 202615%
Somewhat support
Somewhat support
0%20%40%60%80%100%34%28%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat support
June 202634%
July 202628%
Somewhat oppose
Somewhat oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%17%26%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat oppose
June 202617%
July 202626%
Strongly oppose
Strongly oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%9%19%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly oppose
June 20269%
July 202619%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%14%12%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
June 202614%
July 202612%
Arab public
Strongly support
Strongly support
0%20%40%60%80%100%4%2%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly support
June 20264%
July 20262%
Somewhat support
Somewhat support
0%20%40%60%80%100%12%5%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat support
June 202612%
July 20265%
Somewhat oppose
Somewhat oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%30%27%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveSomewhat oppose
June 202630%
July 202627%
Strongly oppose
Strongly oppose
0%20%40%60%80%100%44%58%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveStrongly oppose
June 202644%
July 202658%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%10%8%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
June 202610%
July 20268%
Back to topic selection

Lebanon

1 question

In your opinion, does the current security situation in northern Israel provide residents with security?

Lebanon arena. Most of the public still believes that the current security situation in northern Israel does not enable security for residents, though there was a marked improvement compared with June.

66% believe that the current security situation in the north does not enable security for residents, compared with 30% who believe it does. Compared with June, the share saying the situation does not enable security fell from 81% to 66%, while the share saying it does rose from 15% to 30%.

Political breakdown: 74% of opposition voters believe the situation does not enable security for residents, compared with 54% among coalition voters. Sector breakdown: 65% of Jews and 71% of Arabs believe the situation does not enable security.

Region breakdown: In the Northern District, 47% believe the current security situation enables security for residents — the highest share among districts. In Tel Aviv and the South, 70% believe it does not enable security — the highest share.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Definitely notProbably notProbably yesDefinitely yesDon't know
General sample
22%
44%
26%
66% believe that the current security situation in the north still does not enable security for residents, down from 81% in June.
Show data table
GroupDefinitely notProbably notProbably yesDefinitely yesDon't know
General sample22%44%26%4%4%
Definitely notProbably notProbably yesDefinitely yesDon't know
Coalition voters
16%
38%
37%
Opposition voters
25%
49%
20%
66% believe that the current security situation in the north still does not enable security for residents, down from 81% in June.
Show data table
GroupDefinitely notProbably notProbably yesDefinitely yesDon't know
Coalition voters16%38%37%6%3%
Opposition voters25%49%20%2%4%
Definitely notProbably notProbably yesDefinitely yesDon't know
Jewish public
20%
44%
28%
Arab public
29%
42%
17%
8%
66% believe that the current security situation in the north still does not enable security for residents, down from 81% in June.
Show data table
GroupDefinitely notProbably notProbably yesDefinitely yesDon't know
Jewish public20%44%28%4%4%
Arab public29%42%17%4%8%
Definitely notProbably notProbably yesDefinitely yesDon't know
Jerusalem
12%
51%
23%
9%
Haifa
20%
34%
36%
North
12%
40%
45%
Center
25%
44%
23%
Tel Aviv
22%
48%
25%
South
22%
48%
20%
66% believe that the current security situation in the north still does not enable security for residents, down from 81% in June.
Show data table
GroupDefinitely notProbably notProbably yesDefinitely yesDon't know
Jerusalem12%51%23%9%5%
Haifa20%34%36%5%5%
North12%40%45%2%1%
Center25%44%23%5%3%
Tel Aviv22%48%25%1%4%
South22%48%20%5%5%
Trend over time
General sample
Definitely not
Definitely not
0%20%40%60%80%100%40%22%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveDefinitely not
June 202640%
July 202622%
Probably not
Probably not
0%20%40%60%80%100%41%44%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveProbably not
June 202641%
July 202644%
Probably yes
Probably yes
0%20%40%60%80%100%13%26%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveProbably yes
June 202613%
July 202626%
Definitely yes
Definitely yes
0%20%40%60%80%100%2%4%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveDefinitely yes
June 20262%
July 20264%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%4%4%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
June 20264%
July 20264%
Jewish public
Definitely not
Definitely not
0%20%40%60%80%100%43%21%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveDefinitely not
June 202643%
July 202621%
Probably not
Probably not
0%20%40%60%80%100%43%44%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveProbably not
June 202643%
July 202644%
Probably yes
Probably yes
0%20%40%60%80%100%9%28%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveProbably yes
June 20269%
July 202628%
Definitely yes
Definitely yes
0%20%40%60%80%100%1%4%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveDefinitely yes
June 20261%
July 20264%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%4%4%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
June 20264%
July 20264%
Arab public
Definitely not
Definitely not
0%20%40%60%80%100%27%29%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveDefinitely not
June 202627%
July 202629%
Probably not
Probably not
0%20%40%60%80%100%32%42%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveProbably not
June 202632%
July 202642%
Probably yes
Probably yes
0%20%40%60%80%100%27%17%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveProbably yes
June 202627%
July 202617%
Definitely yes
Definitely yes
0%20%40%60%80%100%7%4%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveDefinitely yes
June 20267%
July 20264%
Don't know
Don't know
0%20%40%60%80%100%7%8%June 2026July 2026
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon't know
June 20267%
July 20268%
Back to topic selection

Israel–U.S. Relations

3 questions

What is your opinion on U.S. President Donald Trump’s commitment to protecting Israel’s security interests?

Israel–U.S. relations. Most of the public believes that President Donald Trump supports Israel only when it serves his interests.

58% believe that Trump supports Israel only when it serves his interests; 23% view him as unpredictable and therefore hard to rely on for security issues; and only 14% see him as strongly committed to defending Israel’s security interests. Compared with June, there was no meaningful change.

Political breakdown: 63% of coalition voters and 62% of opposition voters believe that Trump’s support for Israel is conditional on his interests. Sector breakdown: 65% of Jews believe so, compared with 32% among Arabs.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Trump is deeply committed to protecting Israel’s security interestsTrump supports Israel only when it serves his own interestsTrump is unpredictable, making it difficult to rely on him on security mattersDon't know
General sample
14%
58%
23%
58% believe that President Trump supports Israel only when it serves his interests.
Show data table
GroupTrump is deeply committed to protecting Israel’s security interestsTrump supports Israel only when it serves his own interestsTrump is unpredictable, making it difficult to rely on him on security mattersDon't know
General sample14%58%23%5%
Trump is deeply committed to protecting Israel’s security interestsTrump supports Israel only when it serves his own interestsTrump is unpredictable, making it difficult to rely on him on security mattersDon't know
Coalition voters
18%
63%
16%
Opposition voters
7%
62%
28%
58% believe that President Trump supports Israel only when it serves his interests.
Show data table
GroupTrump is deeply committed to protecting Israel’s security interestsTrump supports Israel only when it serves his own interestsTrump is unpredictable, making it difficult to rely on him on security mattersDon't know
Coalition voters18%63%16%3%
Opposition voters7%62%28%3%
Trump is deeply committed to protecting Israel’s security interestsTrump supports Israel only when it serves his own interestsTrump is unpredictable, making it difficult to rely on him on security mattersDon't know
Jewish public
12%
65%
20%
Arab public
21%
33%
35%
11%
58% believe that President Trump supports Israel only when it serves his interests.
Show data table
GroupTrump is deeply committed to protecting Israel’s security interestsTrump supports Israel only when it serves his own interestsTrump is unpredictable, making it difficult to rely on him on security mattersDon't know
Jewish public12%65%20%3%
Arab public21%33%35%11%
Trend over time
General sample
Deeply committed to Israel’s security
Deeply committed to Israel’s security
0%20%40%60%80%100%35%27%20%29%34%35%21%12%14%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveDeeply committed to Israel’s security
Mar 2535%
Apr 2527%
May 2520%
Jun 2529%
Oct 2534%
Mar 2635%
May 2621%
Jun 2612%
Jul 2614%
Supports Israel only when it serves his own interests
Supports Israel only when it serves his own interests
0%20%40%60%80%100%42%49%52%50%50%45%54%57%58%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveSupports Israel only when it serves his own interests
Mar 2542%
Apr 2549%
May 2552%
Jun 2550%
Oct 2550%
Mar 2645%
May 2654%
Jun 2657%
Jul 2658%
Unpredictable and difficult to rely on
Unpredictable and difficult to rely on
0%20%40%60%80%100%18%19%23%18%11%16%21%27%23%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveUnpredictable and difficult to rely on
Mar 2518%
Apr 2519%
May 2523%
Jun 2518%
Oct 2511%
Mar 2616%
May 2621%
Jun 2627%
Jul 2623%
Don’t know
Don’t know
0%20%40%60%80%100%5%5%6%3%5%5%4%4%5%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – General sample.
Show data table
Survey waveDon’t know
Mar 255%
Apr 255%
May 256%
Jun 253%
Oct 255%
Mar 265%
May 264%
Jun 264%
Jul 265%
Jewish public
Deeply committed to Israel’s security
Deeply committed to Israel’s security
0%20%40%60%80%100%38%30%21%29%33%35%20%9%12%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveDeeply committed to Israel’s security
Mar 2538%
Apr 2530%
May 2521%
Jun 2529%
Oct 2533%
Mar 2635%
May 2620%
Jun 269%
Jul 2612%
Supports Israel only when it serves his own interests
Supports Israel only when it serves his own interests
0%20%40%60%80%100%44%49%56%53%52%49%60%63%65%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveSupports Israel only when it serves his own interests
Mar 2544%
Apr 2549%
May 2556%
Jun 2553%
Oct 2552%
Mar 2649%
May 2660%
Jun 2663%
Jul 2665%
Unpredictable and difficult to rely on
Unpredictable and difficult to rely on
0%20%40%60%80%100%16%18%21%16%11%13%18%25%20%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveUnpredictable and difficult to rely on
Mar 2516%
Apr 2518%
May 2521%
Jun 2516%
Oct 2511%
Mar 2613%
May 2618%
Jun 2625%
Jul 2620%
Don’t know
Don’t know
0%20%40%60%80%100%3%4%3%2%4%3%3%3%3%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Jewish public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon’t know
Mar 253%
Apr 254%
May 253%
Jun 252%
Oct 254%
Mar 263%
May 263%
Jun 263%
Jul 263%
Arab public
Deeply committed to Israel’s security
Deeply committed to Israel’s security
0%20%40%60%80%100%35%27%20%29%34%32%23%23%21%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveDeeply committed to Israel’s security
Mar 2535%
Apr 2527%
May 2520%
Jun 2529%
Oct 2534%
Mar 2632%
May 2623%
Jun 2623%
Jul 2621%
Supports Israel only when it serves his own interests
Supports Israel only when it serves his own interests
0%20%40%60%80%100%42%49%52%50%50%30%34%34%33%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveSupports Israel only when it serves his own interests
Mar 2542%
Apr 2549%
May 2552%
Jun 2550%
Oct 2550%
Mar 2630%
May 2634%
Jun 2634%
Jul 2633%
Unpredictable and difficult to rely on
Unpredictable and difficult to rely on
0%20%40%60%80%100%18%19%23%18%11%29%35%37%35%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveUnpredictable and difficult to rely on
Mar 2518%
Apr 2519%
May 2523%
Jun 2518%
Oct 2511%
Mar 2629%
May 2635%
Jun 2637%
Jul 2635%
Don’t know
Don’t know
0%20%40%60%80%100%5%5%6%3%5%9%8%6%11%Mar 25Apr 25May 25Jun 25Oct 25Mar 26May 26Jun 26Jul 26
Trend over time – Arab public.
Show data table
Survey waveDon’t know
Mar 255%
Apr 255%
May 256%
Jun 253%
Oct 255%
Mar 269%
May 268%
Jun 266%
Jul 2611%
Back to topic selection

How much weight should Israel give to maintaining its strategic alliance with the United States when making decisions on the Palestinian issue?

Israel–U.S. relations. Most of the public believes Israel should give great weight to maintaining the strategic alliance with the United States when making decisions on the Palestinian issue.

63% believe Israel should give great or very great weight to maintaining the strategic alliance with the United States, compared with 29% who believe it should give little or no weight to this consideration.

Political breakdown: 74% of opposition voters believe Israel should give great weight to maintaining the alliance with the United States, compared with 56% among coalition voters. Sector breakdown: 64% of Jews and 59% of Arabs believe so.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
A great deal of weightQuite a lot of weightLittle weightNo weight at allDon't know
General sample
17%
46%
20%
9%
8%
63% believe Israel should give great or very great weight to maintaining the strategic alliance with the United States when making decisions on the Palestinian issue.
Show data table
GroupA great deal of weightQuite a lot of weightLittle weightNo weight at allDon't know
General sample17%46%20%9%8%
A great deal of weightQuite a lot of weightLittle weightNo weight at allDon't know
Coalition voters
8%
48%
24%
15%
Opposition voters
27%
47%
15%
63% believe Israel should give great or very great weight to maintaining the strategic alliance with the United States when making decisions on the Palestinian issue.
Show data table
GroupA great deal of weightQuite a lot of weightLittle weightNo weight at allDon't know
Coalition voters8%48%24%15%5%
Opposition voters27%47%15%5%6%
A great deal of weightQuite a lot of weightLittle weightNo weight at allDon't know
Jewish public
15%
49%
21%
10%
Arab public
24%
35%
14%
21%
63% believe Israel should give great or very great weight to maintaining the strategic alliance with the United States when making decisions on the Palestinian issue.
Show data table
GroupA great deal of weightQuite a lot of weightLittle weightNo weight at allDon't know
Jewish public15%49%21%10%5%
Arab public24%35%14%6%21%
Back to topic selection
This question also appears under another subtopic: Military action in Iran despite confrontation with TrumpGo to question

Internal Threats

Military–society relations and concern about influence campaigns and disinformation during elections.

Military–Society Relations

3 questions

The Knesset recently approved a law freezing arrest and enforcement proceedings for a limited period against Yeshiva students who failed to report for draft duty, provided they are enrolled in full-time Yeshiva study. Do you support or oppose this law?

Military-society relations. The questions regarding the law freezing enforcement proceedings were asked among the Jewish public only. All three questions show sharp gaps between coalition and opposition voters.

Among the Jewish public, 63% oppose the law freezing arrest and enforcement proceedings against yeshiva students who did not report for military service, compared with 32% who support it.

Political breakdown: 56% of coalition voters support the law, compared with only 6% among opposition voters. Conversely, 93% of opposition voters oppose the law, compared with 37% among coalition voters.

Religiosity breakdown: Opposition is especially high among secular respondents, with 84% opposing the law versus only 13% supporting it. Among traditional respondents, 62% oppose the law, while among religious and ultra-Orthodox respondents a majority support it — 56% and 90%, respectively.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Strongly opposeSomewhat opposeSomewhat supportStrongly supportDon't know
Jewish public
48%
15%
15%
17%
Among the Jewish public, 63% oppose the law freezing enforcement proceedings and 32% support it.
Show data table
GroupStrongly opposeSomewhat opposeSomewhat supportStrongly supportDon't know
Jewish public48%15%15%17%5%
Strongly opposeSomewhat opposeSomewhat supportStrongly supportDon't know
Coalition voters
21%
16%
27%
29%
7%
Opposition voters
81%
12%
Among the Jewish public, 63% oppose the law freezing enforcement proceedings and 32% support it.
Show data table
GroupStrongly opposeSomewhat opposeSomewhat supportStrongly supportDon't know
Coalition voters21%16%27%29%7%
Opposition voters81%12%4%2%1%
Strongly opposeSomewhat opposeSomewhat supportStrongly supportDon't know
Secular
72%
12%
7%
Traditional
41%
21%
21%
10%
7%
Religious
19%
17%
31%
25%
8%
Ultra-Orthodox
12%
78%
Among the Jewish public, 63% oppose the law freezing enforcement proceedings and 32% support it.
Show data table
GroupStrongly opposeSomewhat opposeSomewhat supportStrongly supportDon't know
Secular72%12%7%6%3%
Traditional41%21%21%10%7%
Religious19%17%31%25%8%
Ultra-Orthodox5%2%12%78%3%
Back to topic selection

Ahead of the approval of the law freezing enforcement proceedings against Yeshiva students who failed to report for draft duty, the IDF Chief of Staff warned that approving the law would harm the IDF and undermine equality in sharing the burden. In your opinion, was the Chief of Staff’s warning appropriate?

Military-society relations. The questions regarding the law freezing enforcement proceedings were asked among the Jewish public only.

Among the Jewish public, 66% believe the Chief of Staff’s warning — that approval of the law freezing enforcement proceedings would harm the IDF and equality in sharing the burden — was appropriate, compared with 30% who believe it was not appropriate.

Political breakdown: 94% of opposition voters believe the warning was appropriate, compared with 44% among coalition voters. Conversely, 52% of coalition voters believe the warning was not appropriate, compared with only 5% among opposition voters.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Definitely appropriateSomewhat appropriateNot very appropriateNot appropriate at allDon't know
Jewish public
50%
16%
13%
17%
Among the Jewish public, 66% believe the Chief of Staff’s warning was appropriate.
Show data table
GroupDefinitely appropriateSomewhat appropriateNot very appropriateNot appropriate at allDon't know
Jewish public50%16%13%17%4%
Definitely appropriateSomewhat appropriateNot very appropriateNot appropriate at allDon't know
Coalition voters
24%
20%
22%
30%
Opposition voters
84%
10%
Among the Jewish public, 66% believe the Chief of Staff’s warning was appropriate.
Show data table
GroupDefinitely appropriateSomewhat appropriateNot very appropriateNot appropriate at allDon't know
Coalition voters24%20%22%30%4%
Opposition voters84%10%3%2%1%
Back to topic selection

The High Court of Justice issued an interim injunction preventing the entry into force of the law freezing enforcement proceedings against Yeshiva students who failed to report for draft duty, until the petitions against it are decided. In your opinion, was the issuance of the interim injunction appropriate?

Military-society relations. The questions regarding the law freezing enforcement proceedings were asked among the Jewish public only.

Among the Jewish public, 58% believe the High Court interim order preventing the law from taking effect was appropriate, compared with 35% who believe it was not appropriate.

Political breakdown: 89% of opposition voters believe the interim order was appropriate, compared with only 34% among coalition voters. Conversely, 58% of coalition voters believe it was not appropriate, compared with 8% among opposition voters.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Definitely appropriateSomewhat appropriateNot very appropriateNot appropriate at allDon't know
Jewish public
44%
14%
12%
23%
7%
Among the Jewish public, 58% believe the High Court interim order was appropriate.
Show data table
GroupDefinitely appropriateSomewhat appropriateNot very appropriateNot appropriate at allDon't know
Jewish public44%14%12%23%7%
Definitely appropriateSomewhat appropriateNot very appropriateNot appropriate at allDon't know
Coalition voters
17%
17%
21%
37%
8%
Opposition voters
78%
11%
Among the Jewish public, 58% believe the High Court interim order was appropriate.
Show data table
GroupDefinitely appropriateSomewhat appropriateNot very appropriateNot appropriate at allDon't know
Coalition voters17%17%21%37%8%
Opposition voters78%11%2%6%3%
Back to topic selection

Elections and Online Influence

2 questions

To what extent are you concerned about the following scenario during the election period? – A disinformation campaign conducted by domestic actors

Elections and online influence. The questions on election-period influence scenarios were asked among the Jewish public only. Concern is high regarding both domestic campaigns and campaigns operated by a foreign country.

79% of the Jewish public are concerned about a campaign by domestic actors spreading false information during the election period — 46% are very concerned and 33% are somewhat concerned — compared with 18% who are not concerned.

Political breakdown: 92% of opposition voters are concerned about this scenario, compared with 72% among coalition voters.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Very concernedFairly concernedNot very concernedNot concerned at allDon't know
Jewish public
46%
33%
15%
79% of the Jewish public are concerned about a domestic campaign spreading false information during the elections.
Show data table
GroupVery concernedFairly concernedNot very concernedNot concerned at allDon't know
Jewish public46%33%15%3%3%
Very concernedFairly concernedNot very concernedNot concerned at allDon't know
Coalition voters
38%
34%
20%
Opposition voters
59%
33%
79% of the Jewish public are concerned about a domestic campaign spreading false information during the elections.
Show data table
GroupVery concernedFairly concernedNot very concernedNot concerned at allDon't know
Coalition voters38%34%20%5%3%
Opposition voters59%33%6%1%1%
Back to topic selection

To what extent are you concerned about the following scenario during the election period? – An influence campaign conducted by a foreign state

Elections and online influence. The questions on election-period influence scenarios were asked among the Jewish public only.

75% of the Jewish public are concerned about an influence campaign operated by a foreign country during the election period — 44% are very concerned and 31% are somewhat concerned — compared with 21% who are not concerned.

Political breakdown: 81% of opposition voters are concerned about this scenario, compared with 74% among coalition voters.

All questions in this category were asked among the Jewish public only.
Very concernedFairly concernedNot very concernedNot concerned at allDon't know
Jewish public
44%
31%
17%
75% of the Jewish public are concerned about an influence campaign operated by a foreign country.
Show data table
GroupVery concernedFairly concernedNot very concernedNot concerned at allDon't know
Jewish public44%31%17%4%4%
Very concernedFairly concernedNot very concernedNot concerned at allDon't know
Coalition voters
41%
33%
16%
Opposition voters
52%
28%
16%
75% of the Jewish public are concerned about an influence campaign operated by a foreign country.
Show data table
GroupVery concernedFairly concernedNot very concernedNot concerned at allDon't know
Coalition voters41%33%16%5%5%
Opposition voters52%28%16%3%1%
Back to topic selection

Methodology

The survey was conducted on July 23–26, 2026, by the Data Analytics Center at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS). Data were collected through an online survey administered with the assistance of iPanel, with 803 respondents completing the survey in Hebrew and 133 in Arabic. Following population-group weighting, the sample is representative of Israel’s adult population (ages 18 and over). The maximum sampling error for the full sample is ±3.17 percentage points at a 95 percent confidence level.
936respondents
803answered in Hebrew
133answered in Arabic
±3.17%maximum sampling error